Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User resource template for Export Review VM #2602

Closed
Tracked by #2245
tanya-borisova opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2699
Closed
Tracked by #2245

User resource template for Export Review VM #2602

tanya-borisova opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2699
Assignees

Comments

@tanya-borisova
Copy link
Contributor

tanya-borisova commented Sep 15, 2022

Description

As an Airlock Manager,
I want to have a user resource template
So that I can deploy it into Research Workspace and use user resources (VMs in Guacamole) to review export data requests

Requirement

When deployed into a Research Workspace (i.e. for reviewing export requests), a Review VM must be isolated from other resources in the workspace, as in some cases, reviewer is not allowed to access the research, they can only access the data that is intended to be exported.

To achieve this, we can have a private endpoint for the export in progress storage account, and an NSG that allows the VM to access that storage account, but limits access for everything else.

@tanya-borisova tanya-borisova changed the title Review VM is isolated from other resources in the workspace Airlock Export Review VM is isolated from other resources in the workspace Sep 21, 2022
@tanya-borisova tanya-borisova changed the title Airlock Export Review VM is isolated from other resources in the workspace User resource template for Export Review VM Sep 21, 2022
@tanya-borisova tanya-borisova self-assigned this Sep 22, 2022
@tanya-borisova tanya-borisova linked a pull request Oct 3, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant