Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Controlling encoding parameters on the receive side #42

Closed
vasilvv opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Controlling encoding parameters on the receive side #42

vasilvv opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@vasilvv
Copy link
Collaborator

vasilvv commented Nov 15, 2022

Currently, all of the parameters like expiration time for layers are always configured by the sender. This makes sense in most cases (when doing delivery to the CDN or to an end user), however, in case of ingestion, the receiver might have a better understanding of, say, when the layers should expire. We should provide a way for the receiver to give hints to the encoder.

@kixelated
Copy link
Collaborator

Twitch would love the ability to influence the encoder on the server side. Stuff like choosing the renditions, bitrate, codec, CBR/VBR, etc.

@kixelated
Copy link
Collaborator

Meta has asked for something similar too. Although this doesn't need to be part of MoQ; it could be as simple as a JSON file at a known endpoint.

@VMatrix1900
Copy link

+1. The receiver has the final say on the QoE. Feeding the QoE back to sender can help the sender side optimization. Like QoE feedback in this draft.

@afrind
Copy link
Collaborator

afrind commented Aug 5, 2024

Delivery timeouts are coming (#449) which are a way for the subscriber to influence the publisher timeouts in the ingest case. As for codecs, etc, I think the current model is for the broadcaster to advertise all the options via a catalog and let the ingest point subscribe. Closing for now, please open a new issue if there is still something to fix here.

@afrind afrind closed this as completed Aug 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants