You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'd expect to be able to access second.toml's version of metadata.b and metadata.c, but first's version of metadata.c.
But right now, it overrides first.toml's declarations, so I can't access metadata.a.
It would also be nice if it could get to a point where something like this works:
first.toml
[metadata.a]
name = "value"values = [ "value0", "value1" ]
[metadata.b]
name = "value"
second.toml
[metadata.a]
values = [ "value0"]
When accessing metadata.a, you'd get second.toml's version of values, but inherit the rest from first.toml.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For example:
first.toml
second.toml
If I load first.toml, set the result of that to the defaults for second.toml.
I'd expect to be able to access
second.toml
's version ofmetadata.b
andmetadata.c
, butfirst
's version ofmetadata.c
.But right now, it overrides
first.toml
's declarations, so I can't accessmetadata.a
.It would also be nice if it could get to a point where something like this works:
first.toml
second.toml
When accessing
metadata.a
, you'd getsecond.toml
's version ofvalues
, but inherit the rest fromfirst.toml
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: