Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Pt: wiki pages in pt-BR iD #3776

Closed
virgilinojuca opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Use Pt: wiki pages in pt-BR iD #3776

virgilinojuca opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
localization Adapting iD across languages, regions, and cultures

Comments

@virgilinojuca
Copy link

Recently, the Portuguese (Pt:) and Brazilian Portuguese (Pt-br:) wikis were unified into a single namespace (Pt:) so that the Portuguese-speaking community can join forces. There are no Pt-br pages with content in the wiki anymore. All of them were either merged with their correspondent Pt: pages or moved to Pt:. That means that the old Pt-br: pages are just redirects now.

So now we have a problem in iD. Currently, when in the pt-BR interface, which will continue to exist, iD looks up for documentation in the now deprecated Pt-br: namespace, so we only get a warning that the page was moved (#3337). Can you guys change the lookup namespace to Pt: in the pt-BR iD?

@bhousel
Copy link
Member

bhousel commented Jan 18, 2017

Ok, I guess this is a step further beyond #3337. Can someone else (@naoliv?) confirm that all pt-BR: pages on osm wiki are now just redirects to pt: pages? If so, I'm fine with special casing this to use the pt url instead of showing the redirect text.

@bhousel bhousel added the localization Adapting iD across languages, regions, and cultures label Jan 18, 2017
@naoliv
Copy link

naoliv commented Jan 18, 2017

Verified and they are all redirects now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
localization Adapting iD across languages, regions, and cultures
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants