-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate coeffs #393
Deprecate coeffs #393
Conversation
This is fine. It is always hard to guess what everyone's favorite abbr is. How about a decision on the noun vs verb thing, i.e. factor vs factorization? This might be hard because there are names that are nouns that cannot be verbified, and there are names that are verbs that cannot be nounified. |
I don't think we can be consistent on that, but as far as I know the verb form is preferred. |
Bumped the version, but it is failing. |
79319c6
to
00978d8
Compare
Just an import problem I think. Let's see if this works now. |
That is not good news. :-( I have a spelling error in AbstractAlgebra. I've made a PR to fix it. Sorry! |
I guess this is where our new CI will really help us out when it is done! |
We should have waited for the 81 jobs. One of them would have told us, see also oscar-system/OscarDevTools.jl#9. |
Yeah, but 80 of them would have failed for some other reason. :-) Looks good now though. Yay! |
* Replace coeffs -> coefficients. * Replace lc, lt, lm.
This is the Singular equivalent of Nemocas/AbstractAlgebra.jl#805
Of course this will fail until the new version of AbstractAlgebra is released.
This may be breaking for Oscar.