You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In various academic publications and platform examples, I've noticed that conceptual nodes are typically depicted with circular frames. However, while working within the OSTIS platform myself, the graphical output for similar nodes results in square frames instead.
Could you provide insight into why there is this difference in the visual representations? Is this a change that's been implemented in recent updates to the platform, or is there an option within the tool that I might have overlooked that controls the shape of these frames?
Your guidance on how to achieve consistency with the established standards shown in literature would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In various academic publications and platform examples, I've noticed that conceptual nodes are typically depicted with circular frames. However, while working within the OSTIS platform myself, the graphical output for similar nodes results in square frames instead.
Could you provide insight into why there is this difference in the visual representations? Is this a change that's been implemented in recent updates to the platform, or is there an option within the tool that I might have overlooked that controls the shape of these frames?
Your guidance on how to achieve consistency with the established standards shown in literature would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: