no-useless-spread false positive when spreading a Set()

[jelly]

The following warning has an fixer available which transforms the code into

  ⚠ eslint-plugin-unicorn(no-useless-spread): Using a spread operator here creates a new array unnecessarily.
     ╭─[src/helpers.js:703:19]
 702 │
 703 │     const uniq = [...new Set(devs)];
     ·                   ───
 704 │     uniq.sort();
     ╰────
  help: `new Set(devs)` returns a new array. Spreading it into an array expression to create a new array is redundant.

-    const uniq = [...new Set(devs)];
+    const uniq = [new Set(devs)];

This would fails as a Set has no sort(), but maybe more importantly the spread operator isn't useless as removing it produces different code as can be seen below:

> new Set([1,2,3,3]).sort()
Uncaught TypeError: (intermediate value).sort is not a function
> [...new Set([1,2,3,3])].sort()
[ 1, 2, 3 ]
> [new Set([1,2,3,3])].sort()
[ Set(3) { 1, 2, 3 } ]

[camc314]

duplicate of #4872 ? can you confirm?

[jelly]

duplicate of #4872 ? can you confirm?

Sorry, should have tested main. This is indeed fixed.

[camc314]

duplicate of #4872 ? can you confirm?

Sorry, should have tested main. This is indeed fixed.

no worries, thanks for verifying