You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm adding this issue as a summary of the current state and collection of useful resources, because it just took me a bit of time to reconstruct what has happened to this case during the last few years.
In Restructure tutorials #125 we decided to remove FEniCS as a solid participant from the case. Main reason: because the linear solver does not yield sufficiently accurate results.
Adding FEniCS as a solid participant would be helpful for cross-comparison to other solvers (this already helped us to debug the perpendicular flap case, see #250). FEniCS also gives very direct control over the time-stepping scheme being used, which might give us additional understanding for the case (e.g. in https://precice.discourse.group/t/turek-hron-fsi-with-openfoam-and-calculix/1001/14).
I marked this issue as a student issue, because it might be a nice thesis topic.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm adding this issue as a summary of the current state and collection of useful resources, because it just took me a bit of time to reconstruct what has happened to this case during the last few years.
Adding FEniCS as a solid participant would be helpful for cross-comparison to other solvers (this already helped us to debug the perpendicular flap case, see #250). FEniCS also gives very direct control over the time-stepping scheme being used, which might give us additional understanding for the case (e.g. in https://precice.discourse.group/t/turek-hron-fsi-with-openfoam-and-calculix/1001/14).
I marked this issue as a
student
issue, because it might be a nice thesis topic.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: