You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seems to be a regression in perpendicular-flap/solid-fenics when looking at the tip displacement:
#554 is a candidate. Maybe the issue is related to checkpointing and how the values are updated here. If I remember correctly, we only checked the results with the fake fluid solver. Here, no checkpointing is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I also observed a regression in the system tests, which however affects both the OpenFOAM-CalculiX and SU2-FEniCS combinations: precice/precice#2052 (comment)
That one could be something in preCICE or in the tutorials repository. But I see that you have isolated the impact of the FEniCS adapter version here.
There seems to be a regression in
perpendicular-flap/solid-fenics
when looking at the tip displacement:#554 is a candidate. Maybe the issue is related to checkpointing and how the values are updated here. If I remember correctly, we only checked the results with the fake fluid solver. Here, no checkpointing is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: