You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, this guide has a somewhat awkward content structure IMO. As it stands, I believe it is difficult to find answers to the specific questions you might care about, unless you know exactly what you're looking for.
One of the ways that we can improve this would be to pivot the guide away from organising content as "tutorials" / "guides" etc, and more toward separating content on the basis of the audience that would want to read it. A potential split of audiences based on "what you might be interested in" would be:
"consumer": Using Python packages
"author": Author/maintainer of Python software (that likely also uses Python packages)
"tooling-author": Author/maintainer of a tool that interacts with Python packages / index etc.
"contributor" : People who wish to contribute to this guide, specifically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To be clear, this doesn't mean we need to change the actual content or maybe even change the URLs -- it's more a matter of making sure that the user flow through the documentation is one that leads them to the right places more easily and quickly.
@pradyunsg I'm intrigued. Could you give some concrete examples of how the current content would fit into the audience categories you described? Bonus points for linking to the current page.
Currently, this guide has a somewhat awkward content structure IMO. As it stands, I believe it is difficult to find answers to the specific questions you might care about, unless you know exactly what you're looking for.
One of the ways that we can improve this would be to pivot the guide away from organising content as "tutorials" / "guides" etc, and more toward separating content on the basis of the audience that would want to read it. A potential split of audiences based on "what you might be interested in" would be:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: