Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add get_statevector support for BraketLocalBackend #47

Closed
JordanAWS opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

add get_statevector support for BraketLocalBackend #47

JordanAWS opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees
@dakk
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Milestone
0.0.4

Comments

@JordanAWS
Copy link
Collaborator

JordanAWS commented Jun 15, 2022 •
edited by christianbmadsen
Loading

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.

Currently BraketLocalBackend().run(circuit).result().get_statevector() will fail. The state vector result type is available for the Braket Local Simulator: https://github.com/aws/amazon-braket-sdk-python/blob/main/examples/bell_result_types.py#L40
@IceKhan13 IceKhan13 added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jun 21, 2022
@IceKhan13 IceKhan13 added this to the Release 0.0.3 milestone Jun 24, 2022
@IceKhan13 IceKhan13 modified the milestones: Release 0.0.3, 0.0.4 Dec 14, 2022
@manulpatel
Copy link

Hello @JordanAWS! I new to qiskit-bracket and would like to work on this issue. Could you please assign it to me and provide if any further hints?

@dakk dakk mentioned this issue May 27, 2023
Merged
@JordanAWS
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @manulpatel! Just assigned! Let me know if you have any specific questions or if the prompt is unclear :)

@manulpatel
Copy link

manulpatel commented May 30, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Thanks @JordanAWS for assigning me! But it seems @dakk has already done the work. You may consider him.

@JordanAWS
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ah, good point. We will review his PR.

@dakk
Copy link
Contributor

dakk commented May 30, 2023

Ah, good point. We will review his PR.

Thank you Jordan

@dakk
Copy link
Contributor

dakk commented Jun 4, 2023

Since the PR has been merged, should be the issue closed @JordanAWS ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dakk dakk

Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.0.4
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@dakk @christianbmadsen @IceKhan13 @manulpatel @JordanAWS