You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am writing to you regarding the discussion I have opened here regarding the difference between time domain and frequency domain EIS profiles.
According to the suggestion by Dr. Ferran when we reduce the amplitude of input current the difference between two profiles is reducing. According to Ferran it is because pybamm-eis uses a linearised version of the model so it is only an approximation.
Could you please elaborate this behaviour further like how (what equations) it is linearised or if we could use the nonlinear model / or linear model to match the Okane 2022 parameter set and the model. Or please provide any reference for pybamm-eis.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am writing to you regarding the discussion I have opened here regarding the difference between time domain and frequency domain EIS profiles.
According to the suggestion by Dr. Ferran when we reduce the amplitude of input current the difference between two profiles is reducing. According to Ferran it is because pybamm-eis uses a linearised version of the model so it is only an approximation.
Could you please elaborate this behaviour further like how (what equations) it is linearised or if we could use the nonlinear model / or linear model to match the Okane 2022 parameter set and the model. Or please provide any reference for pybamm-eis.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: