Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ergoCub1.0 S/N:000 – Update and improve configuration files #512

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2023
Merged

ergoCub1.0 S/N:000 – Update and improve configuration files #512

merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2023

Conversation

AntonioConsilvio
Copy link
Contributor

@AntonioConsilvio AntonioConsilvio commented May 15, 2023

What's new:

  • head-calib.xml for this issue
  • right_arm-eb22-j7_10-mec.xml and "right_arm-eb22-j7_10-mc_service.xml" for this issue
  • left_arm-eb25-j11_12-mc_service.xml for this issue
  • the 2FOC firmware version is now aligned in the configuration files with the one actually installed on the robot.

In addition, I added the original calibration order in a commented line for each calibration file; to avoid the risk of entering an incorrect calibration sequence in the event of temporary changes to the calibration order.

Notes:

  • ⚠️ I deleted many "custom" files as they were not maintained anymore.
    This was done with the aim of reducing the number of files in the ergoCubSN000 configuration folder to make navigation easier and smoother. Please check among the deleted files whether they are still in use, as in that case they can be restored.

cc @sgiraz @S-Dafarra @lrapetti @GiulioRomualdi @xEnVrE @mfussi66

@S-Dafarra

This comment was marked as resolved.

@xEnVrE

This comment was marked as resolved.

@sgiraz sgiraz changed the title [ergoCubSN000] Numerous update and optimisation of configuration files ergoCub1.0 S/N:000 – Update and improve configuration files May 15, 2023
@pattacini

This comment was marked as resolved.

Copy link
Contributor

@S-Dafarra S-Dafarra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good to me, but I would also wait for the other reviewers as they use the robot more often

Copy link
Member

@Nicogene Nicogene left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In light of @AntonioConsilvio / @sgiraz clarifications lgtm now!

Copy link
Contributor

@sgiraz sgiraz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok for me!

Copy link
Member

@pattacini pattacini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine with me although I'm trying to reinstate the CI on ergoCubSN000, which I temporarily disabled earlier on (see #509).

Also, awaiting @xEnVrE's review.

@pattacini
Copy link
Member

Let me merge this PR straight away.
The CI will be reinstated soon.

@pattacini pattacini merged commit dbc3e54 into robotology:master May 15, 2023
mfussi66 pushed a commit to mfussi66/robots-configuration that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2023
MSECode pushed a commit to valegagge/robots-configuration that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants