Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename alljoints-inertials port to avoid using portprefix #669

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

martinaxgloria
Copy link
Contributor

With:

I added the possibility of reading the Euler angles streamed by the IMUs wrapped up in a single port. I named the port as /${portprefix}/alljoints/inertials following what I've done and tested in simulation. Unfortunately, while working on the real robot, I found that the portprefix is not always defined in the configuration files and, if defined, is not always icub or ergocub. For example, on ergoCubSN000, that port is named /ergoCubSN000/alljoints/inertials.

This PR introduces the fix to have all the port names. I also made the change for the iCubs that expose those measurements.

@pattacini
Copy link
Member

cc @S-Dafarra

Copy link
Member

@pattacini pattacini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix!

Copy link
Member

@pattacini pattacini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one typo to fix.
I'll do it myself.

@martinaxgloria
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks heaps @pattacini!

@pattacini pattacini merged commit e5a262e into robotology:master Jul 18, 2024
1 check passed
@martinaxgloria martinaxgloria deleted the fix/portname branch July 18, 2024 13:05
fils99 pushed a commit to ami-iit/robots-configuration that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants