From 0cc1b86a3a7ca831f31b64b0f96bb25238113221 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caleb Robson <94545082+Spartan2909@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 15:58:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix grammar

---
 library/core/src/hint.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/library/core/src/hint.rs b/library/core/src/hint.rs
index a205565773a71..f6698589ccd92 100644
--- a/library/core/src/hint.rs
+++ b/library/core/src/hint.rs
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ use crate::intrinsics;
 /// ```
 ///
 /// While using `unreachable_unchecked()` is perfectly sound in the following
-/// example, the compiler is able to prove that a division by zero is not
-/// possible. Benchmarking reveals that `unreachable_unchecked()` provides
+/// example, as the compiler is able to prove that a division by zero is not
+/// possible, benchmarking reveals that `unreachable_unchecked()` provides
 /// no benefit over using [`unreachable!`], while the latter does not introduce
 /// the possibility of Undefined Behavior.
 ///