You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #465 I suggested a dedicated issue to deal with nuances of embedding RDF in text/html.
I think this issue could result in a CG NOTE which compiles all the relevant information for everyone who wants to work with this feature.
One of the main topics, in my opinion, will be documenting the pros and cons of using either a <script> tag with various RDF formats or RDFa. I think this page on W3C wiki gives a decent start: https://www.w3.org/wiki/N3inHTML
Contrasted with RDFa
This method differs from RDFa and some other methods for embedding RDF in HTML.
It's a multi-graph technique.
The RDF is hidden from browsers. (RDFa is usually used to make text that's already human-readable machine-readable too.)
Plain old N-Triples can be easily dumped into the HTML without worrying about splitting predicates into prefix:suffix pairs, and without worrying about how to format it to look good for human readers.
In #465 I suggested a dedicated issue to deal with nuances of embedding RDF in
text/html
.I think this issue could result in a CG NOTE which compiles all the relevant information for everyone who wants to work with this feature.
One of the main topics, in my opinion, will be documenting the pros and cons of using either a
<script>
tag with various RDF formats or RDFa. I think this page on W3C wiki gives a decent start: https://www.w3.org/wiki/N3inHTMLI think we should also mention shortly the W3C Microdata to RDF TR since the HTML spec itself defines Microdata
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: