Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

v255 batch #405

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 27, 2024
Merged

v255 batch #405

merged 4 commits into from
May 27, 2024

Conversation

bluca
Copy link
Member

@bluca bluca commented May 27, 2024

No description provided.

yuwata and others added 4 commits May 27, 2024 12:21
@yuwata @bluca
blockdev-util: also check newer value of GENHD_FL_NO_PART flag
2c24e12 
With torvalds/linux@430cc5d,
the value of GENHD_FL_NO_PART, previously named as GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN,
is changed from 0x0200 to 0x0004. So, we need to check both flags.

(cherry picked from commit f0c2668)
@yuwata @bluca
blockdev-util: also check loop/partscan sysattr
7523456 
With torvalds/linux@b9684a7 (v5.19),
we cannot check partition scanning is enabled for a loopback block device
without checking the attribute.

(cherry picked from commit bab8c85)
@YHNdnzj @bluca
tmpfiles: don't compare errno with negative value
db28191 
Follow-up for 677430b

(cherry picked from commit d8f5a31)
@bluca
executor: check for all permission related errnos when setting up IPC…
7dd238a 
… namespace

Denials from AppArmor are raised as EACCES, so EPERM is not enough. Do
the same check as PrivateNetwork above.

Fixes systemd/systemd#31037

Related to 06384eb

(cherry picked from commit cafe40e)
@bluca
Copy link
Member Author

bluca commented May 27, 2024

@mrc0mmand testing-farm:fedora-rawhide-x86_64 is persistently sad in this branch, looks like a testbed setup failure, any idea?

@mrc0mmand
Copy link
Member

@mrc0mmand testing-farm:fedora-rawhide-x86_64 is persistently sad in this branch, looks like a testbed setup failure, any idea?

Looks like there are packages in Rawhide that explicitly depend on systemd >= 256, so I guess switching to F40 (which has v255) should help here (sed -i 's/fedora-rawhide/fedora-40/g' .packit.yml).

@bluca bluca merged commit e481710 into systemd:v255-stable May 27, 2024
40 of 44 checks passed
@bluca
Copy link
Member Author

bluca commented May 27, 2024

@mrc0mmand testing-farm:fedora-rawhide-x86_64 is persistently sad in this branch, looks like a testbed setup failure, any idea?

Looks like there are packages in Rawhide that explicitly depend on systemd >= 256, so I guess switching to F40 (which has v255) should help here (sed -i 's/fedora-rawhide/fedora-40/g' .packit.yml).

Thanks, #406

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@bluca @mrc0mmand @yuwata @YHNdnzj