-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
week-07_isometries3.v
432 lines (363 loc) · 9 KB
/
week-07_isometries3.v
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
(* week-07_isometries3.v *)
(* LPP 2024 - CS3234 2023-2024, Sem2 *)
(* Olivier Danvy <danvy@yale-nus.edu.sg> *)
(* Version of 08 Mar 2024 *)
(* ********** *)
(* A formal study of isometries of the equilateral triangle, *)
(* after Chantal Keller, Damien Pous and Sylvain Chevillard. *)
(* ********** *)
Inductive Rotation : Type :=
R000 : Rotation (* 0 degrees (identity) *)
| R120 : Rotation (* 120 degrees *)
| R240 : Rotation. (* 240 degrees *)
(* ********** *)
(* Performing two rotations in a row, clockwise. *)
(* "RaR" stands for "a Rotation after a Rotation" *)
(*
Definition RaR (r2 r1: Rotation) : ... :=
match r1 with
R000 => match r2 with
R000 => ...
| R120 => ...
| R240 => ...
end
| R120 => match r2 with
R000 => ...
| R120 => ...
| R240 => ...
end
| R240 => match r2 with
R000 => ...
| R120 => ...
| R240 => ...
end
end.
*)
(* Some properties: *)
(*
Proposition R000_is_neutral_for_RaR_on_the_left :
forall r : Rotation,
RaR R000 r = r.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition R000_is_neutral_for_RaR_on_the_right :
forall r : Rotation,
RaR r R000 = r.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition RaR_is_commutative :
forall r1 r2 : Rotation,
RaR r2 r1 = RaR r1 r2.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition RaR_is_associative :
forall r1 r2 r3 : Rotation,
RaR (RaR r3 r2) r1 = RaR r3 (RaR r2 r1).
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition RaR_is_nilpotent_with_order_??? :
forall r : Rotation,
...
Proof.
Abort.
*)
(* ********** *)
(* The following symmetries are indexed by the invariant vertex: *)
Inductive Reflection : Type :=
S_NN : Reflection (* North, at the top *)
| S_SW : Reflection (* South-West, at the bottom left *)
| S_SE : Reflection. (* South-East, at the bottom right *)
(* These reflections are symmetries here. *)
(* Performing two reflections in a row. *)
(* "SaS" stands for "a Symmetry after a Symmetry" *)
(*
Definition SaS (s2 s1 : Reflection) : ... :=
match s1 with
S_NN => match s2 with
S_NN => ...
| S_SW => ...
| S_SE => ...
end
| S_SW => match s2 with
S_NN => ...
| S_SW => ...
| S_SE => ...
end
| S_SE => match s2 with
S_NN => ...
| S_SW => ...
| S_SE => ...
end
end.
*)
(* is SaS commutative? *)
(* is SaS associative? *)
(* is SaS nilpotent? *)
(* ********** *)
(* Performing a rotation and then a reflection in a row. *)
(* "SaR" stands for "a Symmetry after a Rotation" *)
(*
Definition SaR (s : Reflection) (r : Rotation) : Reflection :=
match r with
R000 => match s with
S_NN => ...
| S_SW => ...
| S_SE => ...
end
| R120 => match s with
S_NN => ...
| S_SW => ...
| S_SE => ...
end
| R240 => match s with
S_NN => ...
| S_SW => ...
| S_SE => ...
end
end.
*)
(* ********** *)
(* Performing a reflection and then a rotation in a row. *)
(* "RaS" stands for "a Rotation after a Symmetry" *)
(*
Definition RaS (r : Rotation) (s : Reflection) : Reflection :=
match s with
S_NN => match r with
R000 => ...
| R120 => ...
| R240 => ...
end
| S_SW => match r with
R000 => ...
| R120 => ...
| R240 => ...
end
| S_SE => match r with
R000 => ...
| R120 => ...
| R240 => ...
end
end.
*)
(* ********** *)
Inductive Isomorphism : Type :=
| IR : Rotation -> Isomorphism
| IS : Reflection -> Isomorphism.
(* Identity: *)
Definition Id : Isomorphism := IR R000.
(* Composition: *)
(*
Definition C (i2 i1 : Isomorphism) : Isomorphism :=
match i1 with
IR r1 => match i2 with
IR r2 => IR (RaR r2 r1)
| IS s2 => IS (SaR s2 r1)
end
| IS s1 => match i2 with
IR r2 => IS (RaS r2 s1)
| IS s2 => IR (SaS s2 s1)
end
end.
Proposition Id_is_neutral_on_the_left_of_C :
forall i : Isomorphism,
C Id i = i.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition Id_is_neutral_on_the_right_of_C :
forall i : Isomorphism,
C i Id = i.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition C_is_associative :
forall i1 i2 i3 : Isomorphism,
C i3 (C i2 i1) = C (C i3 i2) i1.
Proof.
Abort.
Lemma composing_an_isomorphism_is_injective_on_the_right :
forall i x y : Isomorphism,
C i x = C i y -> x = y.
Proof.
Abort.
Lemma composing_an_isomorphism_is_injective_on_the_left :
forall i x y : Isomorphism,
C x i = C y i -> x = y.
Proof.
Abort.
Lemma composing_an_isomorphism_is_surjective_on_the_right :
forall i2 i3 : Isomorphism,
exists i1 : Isomorphism,
C i2 i1 = i3.
Proof.
Abort.
Lemma composing_an_isomorphism_is_surjective_on_the_left :
forall i1 i3 : Isomorphism,
exists i2 : Isomorphism,
C i2 i1 = i3.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition C_over_rotations_is_nilpotent_with_order_3 :
forall r : Rotation,
C (C (IR r) (IR r)) (IR r) = Id.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition C_over_symmetries_is_nilpotent_with_order_2 :
forall s : Reflection,
C (IS s) (IS s) = Id.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition C_is_nilpotent_with_order_??? :
forall i : Isomorphism,
...
Proof.
Abort.
*)
(* ********** *)
(* Let us now introduce the vertices: *)
Inductive Vertex : Type := (* enumerated clockwise *)
NN : Vertex
| SW : Vertex
| SE : Vertex.
(* And let us define the effect of applying an isomorphism
to a vertex: *)
Definition A (i : Isomorphism) (v : Vertex) : Vertex :=
match i with
IR r => match r with
R000 => match v with
NN => NN
| SW => SW
| SE => SE
end
| R120 => match v with
NN => SW
| SW => SE
| SE => NN
end
| R240 => match v with
NN => SE
| SE => SW
| SW => NN
end
end
| IS s => match s with
S_NN => match v with
NN => NN
| SW => SE
| SE => SW
end
| S_SE => match v with
NN => SW
| SW => NN
| SE => SE
end
| S_SW => match v with
NN => SE
| SW => SW
| SE => NN
end
end
end.
(*
Proposition A_is_equivalent_to_C :
forall (i1 i2 : Isomorphism) (v : Vertex),
A i2 (A i1 v) = A (C i2 i1) v.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition applying_an_isomorphism_is_injective :
forall (i : Isomorphism) (v1 v2 : Vertex),
(A i v1 = A i v2) -> v1 = v2.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition applying_an_isomorphism_is_surjective :
forall (i : Isomorphism) (v2 : Vertex),
exists v1 : Vertex,
A i v1 = v2.
Proof.
Abort.
*)
(* ********** *)
(* Intensional equality:
two isomorphisms are equal
iff
they are are constructed alike.
*)
Definition intensional_equality (i1 i2: Isomorphism) : Prop :=
i1 = i2.
(* Extensional equality:
two isomorphisms are equal
iff
their graphs are the same.
*)
Definition extensional_equality (i1 i2: Isomorphism) : Prop :=
forall v : Vertex,
A i1 v = A i2 v.
(* The two notions of equalities coincide: *)
Proposition the_two_equalities_are_the_same :
forall i1 i2 : Isomorphism,
intensional_equality i1 i2 <-> extensional_equality i1 i2.
Proof.
Abort.
(* ********** *)
(*
Lemma isomorphism_equality_in_context_on_the_left :
forall x y i : Isomorphism,
x = y -> C x i = C y i.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition take_five :
forall i : Isomorphism,
extensional_equality (C (C (C (C i i) i) i) i) Id
->
i = Id.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition characteristic_property_of_Id :
forall i : Isomorphism,
i = Id <-> forall v : Vertex, A i v = v.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition one_for_the_road :
forall i : Isomorphism,
(forall v : Vertex, A i v = v)
->
C i i = Id.
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition notable_property_of_Id :
exists i : Isomorphism,
exists v : Vertex,
not (A i v = v -> i = Id).
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition notable_property_of_Id' :
not (forall (i : Isomorphism) (v : Vertex),
A i v = v -> i = Id).
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition notable_property_of_symmetries :
forall (i : Isomorphism)
(v : Vertex),
A i v = v ->
((i = IR R0)
\/
(exists s : Reflection,
i = IS s)).
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition notable_property_of_symmetries' :
forall i : Isomorphism,
(exists v : Vertex,
A i v = v) ->
((i = IR R0)
\/
(exists s : Reflection,
i = IS s)).
Proof.
Abort.
Proposition one_more_for_the_road :
forall (i : Isomorphism) (v : Vertex),
A i v = v -> C i i = Id.
Proof.
Abort.
*)
(* ********** *)
(* end of week-07_isometries3.v *)