You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Batteries usually have standardized storage capacity based on the power delivery. It is usually given as number of hours the battery can deliver at full power. For example, a [120MW, 4h] battery would equals to a [120MW, 480MWh] battery.
The power aspect and the storage aspect are de-coupled in OSeMOSYS and it can lead to situation where we would have 120MW battery with 20GWh worth of storage.
I think the solution is a fixed ratio between the power and the storage of a given technology
Feature Description
In the technologies.yaml setup file it would look like something like this :
If such a ratio is applied, in order to avoid confusion, one of the capex should take over the other. For example, consider the capex given by the power technology even if the storage has its own capex.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature Type
Adding new functionality to tz-osemosys
Changing existing functionality in tz-osemosys
Removing existing functionality in tz-osemosys
Problem Description
Batteries usually have standardized storage capacity based on the power delivery. It is usually given as number of hours the battery can deliver at full power. For example, a [120MW, 4h] battery would equals to a [120MW, 480MWh] battery.
The power aspect and the storage aspect are de-coupled in OSeMOSYS and it can lead to situation where we would have 120MW battery with 20GWh worth of storage.
I think the solution is a fixed ratio between the power and the storage of a given technology
Feature Description
In the technologies.yaml setup file it would look like something like this :
long_name: Battery technology
capacity_activity_unit_ratio: 31.536
opex_fixed: 10
capex: 1200
operating_life: 40
energy_to_power_ratio: 0.0144 #PJ/GW 4h -> 4/1000*3.6
operating_modes:
long_name: discharging mode
description: discharging mode
output_activity_ratio:
primary-electricity: 1.
from_storage: {
all regions
"*":# storage unit
{"battery-storage": True}
}
opex_variable: 0
long_name: charging mode
description: charging mode
input_activity_ratio:
primary-electricity: 1.
to_storage: {
all region
"*":# storage unit
{"battery-storage": True}
}
opex_variable: 0
capacity_gross_min: 0
--------------------------------------------
STORAGE UNITS
- Inputs are in petajoules (PJ)
- Outputs are in petajoules (PJ)
--------------------------------------------
storage:
capex: 0
operating_life: 100
residual_capacity: 0
minimum_charge: 0
initial_level: 0
If such a ratio is applied, in order to avoid confusion, one of the capex should take over the other. For example, consider the capex given by the power technology even if the storage has its own capex.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: