Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore items returned by ItemSnapshotter.AlsoHandles during backup #4111

Open
dsu-igeek opened this issue Sep 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
Area/Cloud/vSphere Area/Plugins Issues related to plugin infra/internal plugins Icebox We see the value, but it is not slated for the next couple releases.

Comments

@dsu-igeek
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the problem/challenge you have
Complex objects handled by ItemSnapshotter may have subsidiary objects that the ItemSnapshotter will handle that Velero proper should ignore. For example, in the case of a VM managed via Kubernetes, the may be a VM resource handled by ItemSnapshotter as well as multiple PVs which are also handled as part of the VM (VM snapshot causes PV snapshots to occur). The ItemSnapshotter plugin API provides the AlsoHandles() method which returns any additional resources that would be handled. These resources need to be excluded from the backup.

Vote on this issue!

This is an invitation to the Velero community to vote on issues, you can see the project's top voted issues listed here.
Use the "reaction smiley face" up to the right of this comment to vote.

  • 👍 for "The project would be better with this feature added"
  • 👎 for "This feature will not enhance the project in a meaningful way"
@dsu-igeek dsu-igeek added Area/Cloud/vSphere Area/Plugins Issues related to plugin infra/internal plugins labels Sep 8, 2021
@dsu-igeek dsu-igeek added this to the v1.8.0 milestone Sep 8, 2021
@dsu-igeek dsu-igeek self-assigned this Dec 18, 2021
@dsu-igeek dsu-igeek modified the milestones: v1.8.0, 1.9.0 Dec 21, 2021
@reasonerjt reasonerjt modified the milestones: 1.9.0, 1.10 Jun 1, 2022
@reasonerjt reasonerjt removed this from the 1.10 milestone Oct 12, 2022
@reasonerjt reasonerjt added the Icebox We see the value, but it is not slated for the next couple releases. label Oct 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area/Cloud/vSphere Area/Plugins Issues related to plugin infra/internal plugins Icebox We see the value, but it is not slated for the next couple releases.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants