Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

(Perfomance) dropped drastically with nondecreasing MH *CASE STUDY* #77

Open
xhajnal opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

(Perfomance) dropped drastically with nondecreasing MH *CASE STUDY* #77

xhajnal opened this issue May 27, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@xhajnal
Copy link
Owner

xhajnal commented May 27, 2020

10_default_nondecreasing

Probably it is due to the way how the new point is selected

  • if the whole point is checked and not done iteratively it takes a drastic amount of time (or luck actually) to find it
  • if not maybe the way can be optimised (using norm AND constraint)
@xhajnal xhajnal added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels May 27, 2020
@xhajnal
Copy link
Owner Author

xhajnal commented Jun 17, 2020

tackled in bb8f624

Showing on 5_bees_synchronous, 50 000 iterations

Control (without ordering)

image_mh_control

Old

image_mh_old

New

image_mh_new

@xhajnal xhajnal changed the title perfomance dropped drastically with nondecreasing MH *CASE STUDY* (Perfomance) dropped drastically with nondecreasing MH *CASE STUDY* Jun 18, 2020
@xhajnal
Copy link
Owner Author

xhajnal commented Sep 20, 2020

new MH:
control: without ordering: 33.36s
New: 56.68s

@xhajnal
Copy link
Owner Author

xhajnal commented Sep 21, 2020

New optimisation, it dropped to 36.25

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@xhajnal