Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add curve pools #409

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 28, 2022
Merged

feat: add curve pools #409

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 28, 2022

Conversation

shawnxin89
Copy link
Contributor

@shawnxin89 shawnxin89 commented Jan 26, 2022

Description

[TKR-293]
Curve pools

Mainnet

  • MIM-UST
  • wormhole v2 ust + 3crv
  • OUSD + 3CRV
  • fei + 3CRV
  • DOLA + 3CRV
  • 3EURpool
  • ibEUR/sEUR
  • d3pool
  • rai

Avalanche

  • USDC.e + USDC

Fantom

  • geist
  • FRAX2pool3CRV
  • 3poolV2

Optimism

  • 3pool

Simbot
Mainnet
Mainnet2
Avalanche
Fantom
Optimism

Testing instructions

Types of changes

Checklist:

  • Prefix PR title with [WIP] if necessary.
  • Add tests to cover changes as needed.
  • Update documentation as needed.
  • Add new entries to the relevant CHANGELOG.jsons.

@shawnxin89 shawnxin89 changed the title Feat/curve pool feat: add curve pools Jan 27, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@kimpers kimpers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, just some minor nits. Awesome work! You shall henceforth be known as the curve master 😂

@shawnxin89 shawnxin89 merged commit 5c2255c into development Jan 28, 2022
@shawnxin89 shawnxin89 deleted the feat/curve-pool branch January 28, 2022 20:08
dextracker pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2022
* feat: Additional Curve pools

* more pools

* fix the format

* changlog

* lowercase address

Co-authored-by: Jacob Evans <jacob@dekz.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants