-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 433
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged Noise Map branch #13356
Merged Noise Map branch #13356
Conversation
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
This will add The following labels are available |
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#13356
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#13356
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving to start testing
Error while checking build/O2/fullCI for fc8a064 at 2024-08-27 05:08:
Full log here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The errors are indeed unrelated but please check the comments below.
DataFormats/Detectors/ITSMFT/common/include/DataFormatsITSMFT/NoiseMap.h
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
DataFormats/Detectors/ITSMFT/common/include/DataFormatsITSMFT/NoiseMap.h
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I will soon (1-2 days) make a review of this PR as well just to check there are no conflicts with what we do in ITS. |
Sorry for the delay. To me this does not seem to have an impact on ITS noise calib. |
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#13356
@iravasen So we noticed that just stochastically, we miss a few pixels in a noise scan sometime. These pixels were flagged as noisy in most other noise runs, but in a particular run, due to perhaps some issue with the data communication, this wasn’t flagged as problematic. Merging with two previous noise maps helps reduce this. In our new implementation, we will save both current map and the merged map and every merged map is only an intersection of current +two previous maps. This increases the number of noisy pixels by about 6%, from about 7500 typically to 8000. |
I see thanks a lot! |
@shahor02 I think I have addressed all the points you have raised. Let me know if all looks good to be merged. Thank you |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checks were passed, merging after insignificant change.
To improve the masking of number of noisy pixel, we will now be obtaining a merged noise map where the current noise map is merged with non-unique objects of two maps in the recent past.