Update LICENSE file #1105
Merged
Update LICENSE file #1105
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Use a LICENSE file that matches the conventions tools expect to find when analysing a repository. The license itself isn't being changed, just the location in the repo and the boilerplate is copied from that made for a new repo in GitHub.com when `BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License` is chosen in the UI.
Merged
joelhulen
approved these changes
Apr 12, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use a LICENSE file that matches the conventions tools expect to find when analysing a repository.
The license itself isn't being changed, just the location in the repo and the boilerplate is copied from that made for a new repo in GitHub.com when
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" Licenseis chosen in the UI (example).I found this as part of #1104 as the OpenSSF Best Practices tooling didn't parse the license and treated it as "OTHER". Similarly, the repo's current license file doesn't show a GitHub banner with license information either.