-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix bug in plot.py and add missing test #897
Conversation
I also reverted back to use if statements, which felt simpler in this (2 option) case.
…ssue-894 * commit '4d19db828ea0ee9d3e08b6e767aa2fe0bb163b18': Remove anti pattern. Add another test. Use distutils version comparison.
This reverts commit 4d19db8.
Also change some ResultSet reads to not display a progress bar. This pushes the coverage of this file to 100%.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This all looks good to me @meatballs, I've just pushed f3c3afd which caught two more things (and pushes the plot file coverage to 100%):
- There was the same missing test/bug for the axes for the heatmap (I missed it yesterday)
- There was a missing test for a progress bar run.
I also made some result sets build without a progress bar (just to clean up the output).
Just pushed another commit which ensures the colour bar is correctly placed too. |
e0c8d29
to
08734c8
Compare
Looks fine to me. I don't want to squash all these commits... You might consider an interactive rebase |
I'm agnostic, whatever Owen prefers to do. |
I'd go with just merging with the reversal et al |
Fixes #894