Fail fast if ExtendedSessionsEnabled is requested for a non-.NET worker.

[gukoff]

Problem

If you set extendedSessionsEnabled to true for Python durable function, it fails to complete orchestrations. Although the control queues are properly processed and the history tables are written accordingly, Python worker only triggers the orchestration once and never replays it.

Excerpt from host.json:

{
  "extensions": {
     "durableTask": {
      "hubName": "TaskHub3",
      "extendedSessionsEnabled": true
      "extendedSessionIdleTimeoutInSeconds": 600
     }
  }

Excerpt from the logs:

[2024-01-26T13:29:09.316Z] Durable Functions does not work with extendedSessions = true for non-.NET languages. This value is being set to false instead. See https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/durable/durable-functions-perf-and-scale#extended-sessions for more details.. InstanceId: . Function: . HubName: TaskHub2. AppName: . SlotName: . ExtensionVersion: 2.12.0. SequenceNumber: 0.

Related issue about this parameter I've found via github search: https://github.com/briandunnington/briandunnington.github.com/blob/97f5a9cca08b41654c07d3552e8ede184ae1b8e4/_posts/durable_functions_an_eventstarted_event_is_required.md?plain=1#L61

Solution

The current code emits the warning and overwrites the option value to false. However, it seems like the framework reads the "old" option value before that, e.g. in the InitializeForFunctionsV1I() During execution, at least part of the framework logic still assumes that the extended sessions are on.

A more simple and reliable approach is to just disallow this option value for non-dotnet workers and fail when it's provided.

Pull request checklist

• My changes do not require documentation changes
  • Otherwise: Documentation PR is ready to merge and referenced in pending_docs.md
• My changes should not be added to the release notes for the next release
  • Otherwise: I've added my notes to release_notes.md
• My changes do not need to be backported to a previous version
  • Otherwise: Backport tracked by issue/PR #issue_or_pr
• I have added all required tests (Unit tests, E2E tests)
• My changes do not require any extra work to be leveraged by OutOfProc SDKs
  • Otherwise: That work is being tracked here: #issue_or_pr_in_each_sdk
• My changes do not change the version of the WebJobs.Extensions.DurableTask package
  • Otherwise: major or minor version updates are reflected in /src/Worker.Extensions.DurableTask/AssemblyInfo.cs
• My changes do not add EventIds to our EventSource logs
  • Otherwise: Ensure the EventIds are within the supported range in our existing Windows infrastructure. You may validate this with a deployed app's telemetry. You may also extend the range by completing a PR such as this one.
• My changes should be added to v3.x branch.
  • Otherwise: This change only applies to Durable Functions v2.x and will not be merged to branch v3.x.

[gukoff]

I am surprised all checks have passed, because I didn't edit the tests for the old logic: https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-durable-extension/pull/1502/files#diff-cc6c49a98ce039f487dcb8326901a4efd087351398aa832615d2041389d99bf2R4502

Is there a way to run all tests on this change? I can't easily run tests for this repo locally on OSX, getting various build errors. Would be easier to just do it on CI.

[cgillum]

@gukoff the tests that ran and passed are just the smoke tests - it looks like the integration tests didn't run.

@davidmrdavid what's the proper way to run integration tests for community-contributed PRs for this repo now? Is it /azp run like we do for the durabletask repo?

[cgillum]

Some minor feedback on the error message.

[cgillum]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s), but failed to run 1 pipeline(s).

[cgillum]

Hi @gukoff, it looks like there is at least one test that needs to be updated to account for this new behavior:

Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs.Extensions.DurableTask.Tests.DurableTaskEndToEndTests.ExtendedSessions_OutOfProc_SetToFalse

[gukoff]

@cgillum

The CI checks fail for the seemingly unrelated reasons.

1. Smoke Test - .NET Isolated on Functions V4 / build fails transiently. Here's a fail, and here's a successful run after I replaced docker build in the e2e test with docker build --pull --no-cache, here's another fail after I removed the change, and another success when I brought back --pull. Maybe it's a coincidence, and maybe the CI agents do have stale images in cache. Locally this test runs fine.

2. Smoke Test - .NET in-proc w/ MSSQL on Functions V4 / build fails to start the mssql server because it tries to set an empty password. I added some code in the e2e test to explain the failure if it happens. Maybe you know why SA_PASSWORD is empty for the CI check of this PR, but not for the CI checks on the other PRs?