added 2014-04-01 version #12707
Merged
added 2014-04-01 version #12707
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi, @grchris-microsoft Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience New: Microsoft.Insights/stable/2014-04-01/alertRules_API.json#L598 |
|
| Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: sendToServiceOwners New: Microsoft.Insights/stable/2014-04-01/alertRules_API.json#L570 |
|
| Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isEnabled New: Microsoft.Insights/stable/2014-04-01/alertRules_API.json#L624 |
|
| Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: List alert rules New: Microsoft.Insights/stable/2014-04-01/alertRules_API.json#L302 |
️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers. readme: specification/monitor/resource-manager/readme.md tag: specification/monitor/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2019-06 |
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
- Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.8.6)
- original: stable/2016-03-01/alertRules_API.json <---> new: stable/2014-04-01/alertRules_API.json
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
|
Hi @grchris-microsoft, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
This was referenced Jan 28, 2021
Closed
Closed
JeffreyRichter
added
the
Approved-BreakingChange
JeffreyRichter
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2021
kairu-ms
reviewed
Jan 29, 2021
kairu-ms
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2021
| @@ -521,6 +522,7 @@ input-file: | |||
| - Microsoft.Insights/stable/2015-04-01/eventCategories_API.json | |||
| - Microsoft.Insights/stable/2015-04-01/operations_API.json | |||
| - Microsoft.Insights/stable/2015-04-01/tenantActivityLogs_API.json | |||
| - Microsoft.Insights/stable/2014-04-01/alertRules_API.json | |||
This was referenced Feb 1, 2021
Closed
This was referenced Feb 1, 2021
mkarmark
pushed a commit
to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2021
* added 2014-04-01 version * fix listAlertRuleBySubscription example reference Co-authored-by: Gregory Chris <sgchris@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.