-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
moving swagger to stable #15530
moving swagger to stable #15530
Conversation
Hi, @banggaurav Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'Monitors' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L35 |
|
Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2044 |
|
Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2091 |
|
Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2197 |
|
Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2274 |
|
The operation 'TagRules_Delete' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L572 |
|
The operation 'SubAccountTagRules_Delete' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L1242 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'tagRules' with immediate parent 'LogzMonitorResource', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2172 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'singleSignOnConfigurations' with immediate parent 'LogzMonitorResource', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2252 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'accounts' with immediate parent 'LogzMonitorResource', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2017 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'tagRules' with immediate parent 'LogzMonitorResource', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2172 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: sendingMetrics Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L1727 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: sendingLogs Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L1735 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L1795 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: sendAadLogs Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2136 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: sendSubscriptionLogs Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2140 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: sendActivityLogs Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L2144 |
|
'body' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L268 |
|
'body' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L327 |
|
'ruleSetName' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L486 |
|
'body' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L492 |
|
'ruleSetName' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L542 |
|
'ruleSetName' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L591 |
|
'configurationName' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L706 |
|
'body' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L712 |
|
'configurationName' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L768 |
|
'body' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L877 |
|
'body' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L1044 |
|
'ruleSetName' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L1153 |
|
'body' parameter lacks 'description' property. Consider adding a 'description' element. Accurate description is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.Logz/stable/2020-10-01/logz.json#L1159 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
- Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.9.0)
- current:stable/2020-10-01/logz.json compared with base:preview/2020-10-01-preview/logz.json
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"logz/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2020-10-01-preview",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"logz/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2020-10-01-preview",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"logz/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2020-10-01",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"logz/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2020-10-01",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"logz/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2020-10-01-preview",
"details":"> Loading AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.15.456->4.15.456)"|
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Hi @banggaurav, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
Hi, @banggaurav your PR are labelled with WaitForARMFeedback. A notification email will be sent out shortly afterwards to notify ARM review board(armapireview@microsoft.com). |
Hi @banggaurav, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
You could ignore azure resource schema validation. It doesn't block your PR review and merge |
Closed this in favor of #15598 since they are identical and ARM review has been started on that. |
Hi, @banggaurav. The PR has be closed for a long time and it's related branch still exist. Please tell me if you still need this branch or i will delete it in 14 days. |
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit (including refactoring) and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.