Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add qualityForRecognition attribute to Face Detection #16449

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 10, 2021
Merged

Add qualityForRecognition attribute to Face Detection #16449

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 10, 2021

Conversation

msyache
Copy link
Contributor

@msyache msyache commented Oct 19, 2021 •
edited
Loading

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify (wording update)
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month. n/a
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific langauge SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.

  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @msyache Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

    • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    [Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks.

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 19, 2021 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 8 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    ❌ 1020 - AddedEnumValue The new version is adding enum value(s) 'qualityForRecognition' from the old version.
    New: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L1053:9
    ❌ 1020 - AddedEnumValue The new version is adding enum value(s) 'qualityForRecognition' from the old version.
    New: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L3427:9
    ❌ 1020 - AddedEnumValue The new version is adding enum value(s) 'qualityForRecognition' from the old version.
    New: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L5384:7
    Old: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L5371:7
    ❌ 1020 - AddedEnumValue The new version is adding enum value(s) 'qualityForRecognition' from the old version.
    New: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L1053:9
    ❌ 1020 - AddedEnumValue The new version is adding enum value(s) 'qualityForRecognition' from the old version.
    New: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L2580:9
    ❌ 1020 - AddedEnumValue The new version is adding enum value(s) 'qualityForRecognition' from the old version.
    New: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L4241:7
    Old: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L4214:7
    ❌ 1041 - AddedPropertyInResponse The new version has a new property 'qualityForRecognition' in response that was not found in the old version.
    New: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L3949:7
    Old: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L3949:7
    ❌ 1041 - AddedPropertyInResponse The new version has a new property 'qualityForRecognition' in response that was not found in the old version.
    New: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L3025:7
    Old: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L3025:7
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonGroup_Train' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L757
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'LargePersonGroup_Train' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L1709
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'LargeFaceList_Train' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L2018
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'Snapshot_Take' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L2254
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'Snapshot_Apply' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L2450
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonGroup_Train' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L757
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'LargePersonGroup_Train' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L1709
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'LargeFaceList_Train' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L2018
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'Snapshot_Take' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L2254
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'Snapshot_Apply' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L2450
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonDirectory_CreatePerson' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L2576
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonDirectory_DeletePerson' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L2671
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonDirectory_AddPersonFace' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L2751
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonDirectory_DeletePersonFace' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L2867
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonDirectory_CreateDynamicPersonGroup' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L3037
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonDirectory_UpdateDynamicPersonGroup' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L3093
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonDirectory_DeleteDynamicPersonGroup' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L3184
    ⚠️ R2007 - LongRunningOperationsWithLongRunningExtension The operation 'PersonDirectory_AddPersonFaceFromStream' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation.
    Location: Face/preview/v1.0-preview/Face.json#L3679
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PersonGroupModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PersonGroup' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L529
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PersonGroupModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PersonGroup' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L570
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PersonGroupModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PersonGroup' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L598
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PersonGroupModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PersonGroup' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L632
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PersonGroupModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PersonGroup' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L675
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PersonGroupModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PersonGroup' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L708
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PersonGroupModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PersonGroup' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L759
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'FaceListModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'FaceList' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L789
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'FaceListModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'FaceList' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L830
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'FaceListModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'FaceList' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L864
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'FaceListModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'FaceList' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L905
    ⚠️ R2063 - OperationIdNounConflictingModelNames OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'FaceListModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'FaceList' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change.
    Location: Face/stable/v1.0/Face.json#L935
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️~[Staging] ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    There is no credential detected.
    ️️✔️SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation

    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 19, 2021 •
    edited
    Loading

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand] 
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account.
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ❌azure-sdk-for-go - cognitiveservices/v1.0/face - v59.1.0
    +	Const `Glasses` has been removed
+	Const `HeadWear` has been removed
+	Const `Mask` has been removed
+	Function `Client.DetectWithStreamPreparer` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, io.ReadCloser, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel)` to `(context.Context, io.ReadCloser, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel, *int32)`
+	Function `Client.DetectWithStream` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, io.ReadCloser, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel)` to `(context.Context, io.ReadCloser, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel, *int32)`
+	Function `Client.DetectWithURLPreparer` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, ImageURL, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel)` to `(context.Context, ImageURL, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel, *int32)`
+	Function `Client.DetectWithURL` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, ImageURL, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel)` to `(context.Context, ImageURL, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel, *int32)`
+	Function `LargeFaceListClient.ListPreparer` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, *bool)` to `(context.Context, *bool, string, *int32)`
+	Function `LargeFaceListClient.List` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, *bool)` to `(context.Context, *bool, string, *int32)`
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from e8ddfa3. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] ERROR: pip's dependency resolver does not currently take into account all the packages that are installed. This behaviour is the source of the following dependency conflicts.
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] azure-mgmt-core 1.3.0 requires azure-core<2.0.0,>=1.15.0, but you have azure-core 1.6.0 which is incompatible.
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] ERROR: pip's dependency resolver does not currently take into account all the packages that are installed. This behaviour is the source of the following dependency conflicts.
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] opencensus-ext-azure 1.1.0 requires azure-core<2.0.0,>=1.12.0, but you have azure-core 1.6.0 which is incompatible.
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] azure-mgmt-core 1.3.0 requires azure-core<2.0.0,>=1.15.0, but you have azure-core 1.6.0 which is incompatible.
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] azure-identity 1.7.1 requires azure-core<2.0.0,>=1.11.0, but you have azure-core 1.6.0 which is incompatible.
cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️azure-cognitiveservices-vision-face [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] 
      info	[Changelog] data-plan skip changelog generation temporarily
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from e8ddfa3. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
cmderr	[generate.py] 2021-11-10 00:47:56 ERROR [Skip] readme path does not format as specification/*/resource-manager/readme.md
warn	No file changes detected after generation
warn	No package detected after generation
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from e8ddfa3. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      command	sh ./eng/initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
command	generator automation ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️cognitiveservices/v1.0/face [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - Function `Client.DetectWithStream` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, io.ReadCloser, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel)` to `(context.Context, io.ReadCloser, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel, *int32)`
info	[Changelog] - Function `Client.DetectWithURLPreparer` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, ImageURL, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel)` to `(context.Context, ImageURL, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel, *int32)`
info	[Changelog] - Function `LargeFaceListClient.ListPreparer` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, *bool)` to `(context.Context, *bool, string, *int32)`
info	[Changelog] - Function `Client.DetectWithURL` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, ImageURL, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel)` to `(context.Context, ImageURL, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel, *int32)`
info	[Changelog] - Function `Client.DetectWithStreamPreparer` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, io.ReadCloser, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel)` to `(context.Context, io.ReadCloser, *bool, *bool, []AttributeType, RecognitionModel, *bool, DetectionModel, *int32)`
info	[Changelog] - Function `LargeFaceListClient.List` parameter(s) have been changed from `(context.Context, *bool)` to `(context.Context, *bool, string, *int32)`
info	[Changelog] - Const `Mask` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Const `HeadWear` has been removed
info	[Changelog] - Const `Glasses` has been removed
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] ### New Content
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] - New const `Uncertain`
info	[Changelog] - New const `AccessoryTypeHeadWear`
info	[Changelog] - New const `OtherMaskOrOcclusion`
info	[Changelog] - New const `QualityForRecognitionHigh`
info	[Changelog] - New const `QualityForRecognitionLow`
info	[Changelog] - New const `QualityForRecognitionMedium`
info	[Changelog] - New const `NoMask`
info	[Changelog] - New const `FaceMask`
info	[Changelog] - New const `AccessoryTypeGlasses`
info	[Changelog] - New const `AccessoryTypeMask`
info	[Changelog] - New const `AttributeTypeQualityForRecognition`
info	[Changelog] - New const `Recognition04`
info	[Changelog] - New const `AttributeTypeMask`
info	[Changelog] - New const `Detection03`
info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleQualityForRecognitionValues() []QualityForRecognition`
info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleMaskTypeValues() []MaskType`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `Mask`
info	[Changelog] - New struct `NonNullableNameAndNullableUserDataContract`
info	[Changelog] - New field `Mask` in struct `Attributes`
info	[Changelog] - New field `QualityForRecognition` in struct `Attributes`
info	[Changelog]
info	[Changelog] Total 9 breaking change(s), 21 additive change(s).
info	[Changelog]
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-js failed [Detail]
    • ❌Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from e8ddfa3. SDK Automation 14.0.0 
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
command	autorest --version=V2 --typescript --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION --use=@microsoft.azure/autorest.typescript@4.7.0 --typescript-sdks-folder=/home/vsts/work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js ../../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/cognitiveservices/data-plane/Face/readme.md
    • ❌@azure/cognitiveservices-face [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] 
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-js/azure-sdk-for-js/sdk/cognitiveservices/cognitiveservices-face]: npm pack --silent
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    This was referenced Oct 19, 2021
    Closed
    Closed
    @msyache msyache marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2021 21:27
    @ghost
    Copy link

    ghost commented Nov 7, 2021

    Hi, @msyache. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

    @ghost ghost added the no-recent-activity label Nov 7, 2021
    @ghost ghost removed the no-recent-activity label Nov 9, 2021
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    NewApiVersionRequired reason:

    A service’s API is a contract with customers and is represented by using the api-version query parameter. Changes such as adding an optional property to a request/response or introducing a new operation is a change to the service’s contract and therefore requires a new api-version value. This is critically important for documentation, client libraries, and customer support.

    EXAMPLE: if a customer calls a service in the public cloud using api-version=2020-07-27, the new property or operation may exist but if they call the service in a government cloud, air-gapped cloud, or Azure Stack Hub cloud using the same api-version, the property or operation may not exist. Because there is no clear relationship between the service api-version and the new property/operation, customers can’t trust the documentation and Azure customer have difficulty helping customers diagnose issues. In addition, each client library version documents the service version it supports. When an optional property or new operation is added to a service and its Swagger, new client libraries must be produced to expose this functionality to customers. Without updating the api-version, it is unclear to customers which version of a client library supports these new features.

    @JeffreyRichter JeffreyRichter added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Nov 9, 2021
    @JeffreyRichter
    Copy link
    Member

    JeffreyRichter commented Nov 9, 2021 via email

    @msyache msyache mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2021
    Merged
    11 tasks
    @lmazuel lmazuel merged commit e8ddfa3 into Azure:main Nov 10, 2021
    This was referenced Nov 10, 2021
    Closed
    Closed
    Closed
    @msyache msyache mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2021
    Closed
    11 tasks
    LeiWang3 pushed a commit to LeiWang3/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2022
    @msyache @LeiWang3
    Add qualityForRecognition attribute to Face Detection (Azure#16449)
    d158c43 
    * Add qualityForRecognition attribute to Face Detection

* Add a line for recognition model restriction

* Fix typo

* Add definitions for generation

Co-authored-by: Yang Chen <yachen4@microsoft.com>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Reviewers

    @lmazuel lmazuel lmazuel approved these changes

    @anuchandy anuchandy anuchandy approved these changes

    @yangyuan yangyuan Awaiting requested review from yangyuan yangyuan is a code owner

    @JeffreyRichter JeffreyRichter Awaiting requested review from JeffreyRichter

    @johanste johanste Awaiting requested review from johanste

    Assignees

    @anuchandy anuchandy

    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 CI-BreakingChange-Go
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
    4 participants
    @msyache @JeffreyRichter @lmazuel @anuchandy