Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Hub Generated] Publish private branch 'datafactory/liudan7/AdlsSwaggerSupportExpression' #23396

Conversation

dandandanliu915
Copy link
Contributor

This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@dandandanliu915
Copy link
Contributor Author

The PR is created based on the updates in the private branch. The updates in the PR has already been reviewed and approved with this PR Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/11888

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @dandandanliu915 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vscswagger@microsoft.com

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 3, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 2 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    Pipeline.json 2018-06-01(011e9a2) 2018-06-01(main)
    Rule Message
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one 'boolean'.
    New: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L358:9
    Old: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L358:9
    1026 - TypeChanged The new version has a different type 'object' than the previous one 'boolean'.
    New: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L413:9
    Old: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L413:9
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.0.0) new version base version
    package-2018-06 package-2018-06(011e9a2) package-2018-06(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L46
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ControlActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L197
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ExecutionActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L207
    IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L238
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'CopyActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L1536
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'CopyActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L1575
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightHiveActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5196
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightHiveActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5215
    IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5266
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightPigActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5285
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightPigActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5304
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightMapReduceActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5343
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightMapReduceActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5362
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightStreamingActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5423
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightStreamingActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5442
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightSparkActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5527
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'HDInsightSparkActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5546
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ExecuteSSISPackageActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5596
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ExecuteSSISPackageActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5615
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'CustomActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5915
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'CustomActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5934
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'CustomActivityReferenceObject' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5974
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'SqlServerStoredProcedureActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L5999
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'SqlServerStoredProcedureActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L6019
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ExecutePipelineActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L6035
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'ExecutePipelineActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L6071
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DeleteActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L6091
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'DeleteActivityTypeProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L6110
    IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L6117
    MissingTypeObject The schema 'AzureDataExplorerCommandActivity' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: stable/2018-06-01/entityTypes/Pipeline.json#L6143
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

    API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 3, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking


    azure-sdk-for-js - @azure/arm-datafactory - 12.0.0
    +	Type of parameter enablePartitionDiscovery of interface AzureBlobFSReadSettings is changed from boolean to any
    +	Type of parameter enablePartitionDiscovery of interface AzureDataLakeStoreReadSettings is changed from boolean to any

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c9032d. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:671
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 671 | �[0m         �[36;1mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mFailed to generate sdk. exit code: False
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGet-ChildItem: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:759
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 759 | �[0m … rtifacts += �[36;1mGet-ChildItem $artifactsPath -Filter *.nupkg -exclude *.s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mCannot find path
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m'/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/packages/Debug/' because
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1mit does not exist.
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:671
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 671 | �[0m         �[36;1mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mFailed to generate sdk artifact
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
    • Azure.ResourceManager.DataFactory [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c9032d. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] notice
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 9.5.0 -> 9.6.3
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.6.3>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g npm@9.6.3` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-datafactory [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model IntegrationRuntimeDataFlowProperties has a new parameter custom_properties
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c9032d. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/datafactory/armdatafactory [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - Type of `AzureBlobFSReadSettings.EnablePartitionDiscovery` has been changed from `*bool` to `any`
      info	[Changelog] - Type of `AzureDataLakeStoreReadSettings.EnablePartitionDiscovery` has been changed from `*bool` to `any`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `IntegrationRuntimeDataFlowPropertiesCustomPropertiesItem`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `CustomProperties` in struct `IntegrationRuntimeDataFlowProperties`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 2 breaking change(s), 3 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c9032d. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-datafactory [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface IntegrationRuntimeDataFlowPropertiesCustomPropertiesItem
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface IntegrationRuntimeDataFlowProperties has a new optional parameter customProperties
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] **Breaking Changes**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Type of parameter enablePartitionDiscovery of interface AzureBlobFSReadSettings is changed from boolean to any
      info	[Changelog]   - Type of parameter enablePartitionDiscovery of interface AzureDataLakeStoreReadSettings is changed from boolean to any
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c9032d. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]  WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️datafactory [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 2c9032d. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • Az.datafactory.DefaultTag [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 3, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/datafactory/armdatafactory Create ApiView failed. Please ask PR assignee for help
    Java azure-resourcemanager-datafactory https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/15898fd66ee54732a1f64c2b07448bc3
    JavaScript @azure/arm-datafactory https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/e3d9322d7ffb4ab3b03b8a470a74e407

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @dandandanliu915, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @dandandanliu915
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    The PR is created based on the updates in the private branch. The updates in the PR has already been reviewed and approved with this PR https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/11888

    @live1206 live1206 added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Apr 4, 2023
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-BreakingChange-JavaScript Data Factory resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants