Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

switch tooling over to typespec #29501

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 24, 2023
Merged

switch tooling over to typespec #29501

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 24, 2023

Conversation

iscai-msft
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please add an informative description that covers that changes made by the pull request and link all relevant issues.

If an SDK is being regenerated based on a new swagger spec, a link to the pull request containing these swagger spec changes has been included above.

All SDK Contribution checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce [breaking changes]
  • CHANGELOG is updated for new features, bug fixes or other significant changes.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

Copy link
Member

@msyyc msyyc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we shall wait for other language together and test it before merge so block it temporarily.
java: https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/pull/34136/files

test env: openapi-env-test/azure-rest-api-specs#3653

@msyyc msyyc merged commit 4fa0545 into main Mar 24, 2023
@msyyc msyyc deleted the typespec_gen_script branch March 24, 2023 01:47
iscai-msft added a commit to iscai-msft/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
…into network_ga

* 'main' of https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-python: (63 commits)
  check only once whether artifact extension exists (Azure#29594)
  code and test (Azure#29530)
  fix: support data binding expression for resources.xxx (Azure#29559)
  code and test (Azure#29558)
  [ServiceBus] enable sovereign cloud testing (Azure#29202)
  [AutoRelease] t2-communication-2023-03-20-22792(can only be merged by SDK owner) (Azure#29453)
  [Identity] Allow configurable process timeouts (Azure#28290)
  Increment package version after release of azure-containerregistry (Azure#29582)
  Update optional (Azure#28435)
  [Monitor][Query] Add sample notebook for large queries (Azure#28148)
  Update CHANGELOG.md (Azure#29580)
  [ServiceBus] remove msrest (Azure#29324)
  Explicitly set PSNativeCommandArgumentPassing to Legacy for git push script (Azure#29554)
  [ML][Pipelines] Support queue settings in pipeline job (Azure#29209)
  add experimental decorator for datatransfer (Azure#29562)
  Featurestore/online store crud new pr (Azure#29546)
  switch tooling over to typespec (Azure#29501)
  set up base path for feature set in load function (Azure#29544)
  Address credential description in docstring (Azure#29549)
  [Monitor] Regen query and ingestion (Azure#29504)
  ...
@@ -1,127 +0,0 @@
# For details see https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/blob/main/doc/common/Cadl-Project-Scripts.md
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should not be deleting files under eng\common directly in a language repo. In fact I don't know how this didn't fail as we have a CI check for this. I've filed a bug to investigate this.

Copy link
Member

@weshaggard weshaggard Apr 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I got this back in sync with #29772

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants