Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

defined constructors should reside in the AST module #287

Closed
6 tasks done
andreasabel opened this issue Jan 4, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed
6 tasks done

defined constructors should reside in the AST module #287

andreasabel opened this issue Jan 4, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
define Issue with define pragma enhancement Java
Milestone

Comments

@andreasabel
Copy link
Member

andreasabel commented Jan 4, 2020

defined constructors should reside in the AST module, rather than just in the parser.

  • Modify the TypeChecker to store the inferred types of the definition arguments.
  • Place the definitions in the AST module (together with their type signatures).
  • Java: cannot place into package Absyn, place in class AbsynDef

Backends:

  • Agda
  • Haskell
  • C
  • C++
  • Java
  • Ocaml
@andreasabel andreasabel added enhancement define Issue with define pragma labels Jan 4, 2020
@andreasabel andreasabel modified the milestone: 2.8.4 Jan 4, 2020
@andreasabel andreasabel self-assigned this Mar 21, 2021
@andreasabel andreasabel added this to the 2.9.2 milestone Mar 21, 2021
@andreasabel andreasabel removed the C++ label Apr 1, 2021
andreasabel added a commit that referenced this issue May 18, 2021
- do not invoke the type checker a second time
- 'cons' needed in AbsynDef.java
- sanitize Java keywords clashing with definitions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
define Issue with define pragma enhancement Java
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant