Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix imports #25

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Fix imports #25

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

csikb
Copy link
Contributor

@csikb csikb commented Apr 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated database connection handling for improved stability and performance.
  • New Features
    • Enhanced API readability and simplicity by integrating a new naming convention plugin.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates primarily focus on refining the integration with the PostgreSQL database and enhancing the GraphQL API's usability. The modifications include a direct reference adjustment for the Pool class from the pg package and the inclusion of the PgSimplifyInflectorPlugin to streamline the GraphQL schema. These changes aim to simplify development by ensuring more intuitive database interactions and a more approachable API structure.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/database/postgres.ts
tests/database/postgres.test.ts
Updated pg import and Pool instantiation to use pg.Pool. Adjusted test assertions accordingly.
src/middleware/.../postgraphile.ts Added PgSimplifyInflectorPlugin to PostGraphileOptions for a simplified GraphQL schema.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where logic intertwines,
A rabbit hopped through, refining the lines.
With a flick and a hop, pg.Pool now in place,
And PgSimplifyInflector, adding grace.
So here’s to the changes, both big and small,
May your queries be swift, and your bugs ever small.
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b45a78b and 1769b47.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/database/postgres.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/middleware/postgraphile.ts (2 hunks)
  • tests/database/postgres.test.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
src/database/postgres.ts (2)

1-1: The updated import statement for pg aligns with the PR objectives to standardize the import approach. Good job on enhancing code readability and maintainability.


4-4: The change in the instantiation method for Pool to use pg.Pool is consistent with the updated import approach and enhances code consistency. Well done.

tests/database/postgres.test.ts (3)

2-2: The updated import statement for pg in the test file aligns with the changes in the main codebase, ensuring consistency. Good job.


7-9: The adjustment in the mock setup for Pool to reflect the new import approach is appropriate and ensures consistency with the main codebase. Nicely done.


27-28: The updates to the test assertions to use pg.Pool align with the new import approach and mock setup, ensuring consistency across the codebase. Excellent work.

src/middleware/postgraphile.ts (1)

15-15: The addition of the PgSimplifyInflectorPlugin as an append plugin is a valuable enhancement that simplifies GraphQL inflections, improving both the development experience and the API's usability. Great choice!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (b45a78b) to head (5720414).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #25   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           11        11           
  Lines          121       122    +1     
  Branches         5         5           
=========================================
+ Hits           121       122    +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@csikb csikb added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 5, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1769b47 and 5720414.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/database/postgres.test.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/database/postgres.test.ts

Merged via the queue into main with commit 595f277 Apr 5, 2024
9 checks passed
@csikb csikb deleted the fix-imports branch April 5, 2024 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant