Remove description of GAMMA concepts as "experimental in v0.8". (kube…

…rnetes-sigs#3114)
BobyMCbobs · Jul 10, 2024 · 0de5fae · 0de5fae
1 parent 4ffd19b
commit 0de5fae
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 0 additions and 22 deletions.
diff --git a/site-src/concepts/api-overview.md b/site-src/concepts/api-overview.md
@@ -320,16 +320,6 @@ Please refer to the [TLS details](/guides/tls) guide for a deep dive on TLS.
 
 ## Attaching Routes to Services
 
-!!! danger "Experimental in v0.8.0"
-
-    The [GAMMA initiative][gamma] work for supporting service mesh use cases
-    is _experimental_ in `v0.8.0`. It is possible that it will change; we do
-    not recommend it in production at this point.
-
-    In particular, binding Routes directly to Services seems to be the current
-    best choice for configuring mesh routing, but it is still **experimental**
-    and thus **subject to change**.
-
 When using Gateway API to configure a [service mesh], the Route will
 attach directly to a Service, representing configuration meant to be applied
 to any traffic directed to the Service. How and which Routes attach to a given

diff --git a/site-src/concepts/use-cases.md b/site-src/concepts/use-cases.md
@@ -125,12 +125,6 @@ that Chihiro and Ian are handling.
 
 ## Basic [east/west] use case
 
-!!! danger "Experimental in v0.8.0"
-
-    The [GAMMA initiative][gamma] work for supporting service mesh use cases
-    is _experimental_ in `v0.8.0`. It is possible that it will change; we do
-    not recommend it in production at this point.
-
 In this scenario, Ana has built a workload which is already running in a
 cluster with a [GAMMA]-compliant [service mesh]. She wants to use the mesh to
 protect her workload by rejecting calls to her workload with incorrect
@@ -158,12 +152,6 @@ bottlenecks in requests to Chihiro or Ian.
 
 ## Gateway and mesh use case
 
-!!! danger "Experimental in v0.8.0"
-
-    The [GAMMA initiative][gamma] work for supporting service mesh use cases
-    is _experimental_ in `v0.8.0`. It is possible that it will change; we do
-    not recommend it in production at this point.
-
 This is effectively a combination of the [multiple applications behind a
 single Gateway](#multiple-applications-behind-a-single-gateway) and [basic
 east/west](#basic-eastwest-use-case) use cases: