Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added context object #1

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 24, 2024
Merged

Added context object #1

merged 8 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

Bullrich
Copy link
Owner

@Bullrich Bullrich commented May 24, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a continuous integration workflow to automatically run tests, formatting, linting, and documentation checks on pull requests and pushes to the main branch.
    • Added a Context struct to handle context objects injected by GitHub actions, enabling better retrieval and parsing of event details and repository information.
  • Dependencies

    • Added json version 0.12.4 as a new dependency.
  • Documentation

    • Included the content of README.md in the main module's documentation for better reference.

@Bullrich Bullrich self-assigned this May 24, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 24, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@Bullrich has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1d3c34 and 9acf62d.

Walkthrough

The recent updates introduce a continuous integration workflow using GitHub Actions, integrate a new dependency, and enhance the codebase with context handling and error management. The test.yml file sets up automated testing, while the context.rs and error.rs files add structures and functions for managing GitHub action contexts and errors. Documentation has been updated in main.rs, and a new module for error handling has been included.

Changes

File/Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Added a CI workflow to run tests on pull requests and main branch pushes using GitHub Actions.
Cargo.toml Added dependency on json version 0.12.4.
src/context.rs Introduced Context and Repo structs, and functions for handling GitHub action contexts.
src/error.rs Added ActionsError enum for error handling with Error and Display trait implementations.
src/main.rs Included new error module and added README.md content to the main module documentation.

In the land of code, where actions flow,
A rabbit hops, with joy to show.
CI tests run swift and bright,
Contexts handled, errors in sight.
Dependencies fresh, the code does grow,
In GitHub's garden, watch it glow! 🌟🐇


Note

Free review on us!

CodeRabbit is offering free reviews until Mon May 27 2024 to showcase some of the refinements we've made.

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6fedfa0 and c1d3c34.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • src/context.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/error.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/main.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Cargo.toml
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
Test (clippy) failure (16)

src/context.rs: [failure] 11-11:
struct Context is never constructed


src/context.rs: [failure] 30-30:
struct Repo is never constructed


src/context.rs: [failure] 42-42:
function get_context is never used


src/context.rs: [failure] 80-80:
function get_env is never used


src/context.rs: [failure] 87-87:
function get_env_or is never used


src/context.rs: [failure] 94-94:
function get_repo is never used


src/context.rs: [failure] 108-108:
unneeded return statement


src/context.rs: [failure] 97-97:
single-character string constant used as pattern


src/error.rs: [failure] 9-9:
variant Context is never constructed

Additional comments not posted (13)
src/main.rs (3)

1-1: The inclusion of the context module aligns with the PR objectives.


2-2: The inclusion of the error module aligns with the PR objectives.


4-4: Including the README.md as a documentation string is a good practice for providing an overview at the top of the main file.

src/error.rs (3)

12-12: Implementation of the Error trait for ActionsError is standard and correct.


14-21: Implementation of the Display trait for ActionsError is correct and provides a clear error message.


7-10: The Context variant of ActionsError is defined but never constructed. Please verify if this variant is necessary or consider removing it if it's not used.

Verification successful

The Context variant of ActionsError is indeed used in src/context.rs. Let's verify the context and necessity of this usage by examining the relevant lines in src/context.rs.


The Context variant of ActionsError is used in src/context.rs to handle an error case when certain environment variables are missing. This usage is valid and necessary.

  • src/context.rs: The Context variant is used to return an error when the GITHUB_REPOSITORY environment variable is not set correctly.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `Context` variant is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `Context` variant usage. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type rust $'ActionsError::Context'

Length of output: 88



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Display the lines around the usage of `ActionsError::Context` in `src/context.rs`.

# Test: Show the context of the usage.
rg --type rust --context 10 $'ActionsError::Context' src/context.rs

Length of output: 667

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

1-31: The new GitHub Actions workflow is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives of adding CI tests. It correctly uses a matrix strategy for various commands such as formatting, linting, and documentation checks.

src/context.rs (6)

42-78: The get_context function is well-implemented with comprehensive error handling and environment variable checks. However, please verify if this function is used as intended in the codebase.

Verification successful

The get_context function is indeed used within the same file src/context.rs. It is called and unwrapped, indicating it is utilized but only within this file. This suggests that the function is not unused, but its scope of usage is limited.

  • Location of usage: src/context.rs (line with let data = get_context().unwrap();)
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `get_context` function is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `get_context` function usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's called.
rg --type rust $'get_context()'

Length of output: 157


80-84: The get_env function retrieves environment variables with appropriate error handling. However, please verify if this function is used as intended in the codebase.

Verification successful

The initial script to search for get_env usage failed due to a regex parse error. Let's correct the regex and re-run the search to verify if the get_env function is used anywhere in the codebase.


The get_env function is indeed used multiple times within the src/context.rs file. Therefore, the function is necessary and actively utilized in the codebase.

  • src/context.rs: Multiple instances where get_env is called.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `get_env` function is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `get_env` function usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's called.
rg --type rust $'get_env('

Length of output: 94



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `get_env` function is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `get_env` function usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's called.
rg --type rust 'get_env\('

Length of output: 734


94-119: The get_repo function retrieves repository information from environment variables or JSON payload. However, please verify if this function is used as intended in the codebase.

Verification successful

The get_repo function is indeed used within the src/context.rs file. Specifically, it is called to retrieve repository information.

  • src/context.rs: The function is called and defined within this file.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `get_repo` function is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `get_repo` function usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's called.
rg --type rust $'get_repo('

Length of output: 97



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `get_repo` function is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `get_repo` function usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's called.
rg --type rust 'get_repo\('

Length of output: 166


87-91: The get_env_or function retrieves environment variables with a default value. However, please verify if this function is used as intended in the codebase.

Verification successful

The get_env_or function is indeed used in the codebase, specifically in the src/context.rs file. Here are the locations where it is called:

  • src/context.rs: api_url: get_env_or("GITHUB_API_URL", "https://api.github.com"),
  • src/context.rs: server_url: get_env_or("GITHUB_SERVER_URL", "https://github.com"),
  • src/context.rs: graphql_url: get_env_or("GITHUB_GRAPHQL_URL", "https://api.github.com/graphql"),

This confirms that the function is utilized as intended.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `get_env_or` function is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `get_env_or` function usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's called.
rg --type rust $'get_env_or('

Length of output: 103



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `get_env_or` function is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `get_env_or` function usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's called.
rg --type rust 'get_env_or\('

Length of output: 385


11-27: The Context struct is well-defined with appropriate fields. However, please verify if this struct is constructed and used as intended in the codebase.

Verification successful

The previous shell script contained a syntax error due to an unclosed counted repetition in the regex pattern. Let's correct the pattern and re-run the script to verify if the Context struct is used anywhere in the codebase.


The previous shell script still contained a syntax error due to an unclosed counted repetition in the regex pattern. Let's correct the pattern and re-run the script to verify if the Context struct is used anywhere in the codebase.


The corrected shell script found an occurrence where the Context struct is constructed in src/context.rs. This indicates that the Context struct is indeed used in the codebase. Let's identify the exact location and context of this construction to ensure it is used as intended.


The Context struct is indeed constructed and used in the codebase, specifically in the src/context.rs file. This confirms that the struct is utilized as intended.

  • src/context.rs: The Context struct is constructed and returned in a function.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `Context` struct is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `Context` struct usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's constructed.
rg --type rust $'Context {'

Length of output: 110



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `Context` struct is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `Context` struct usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's constructed.
rg --type rust 'Context {'

Length of output: 110



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the `Context` struct is used anywhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `Context` struct usage. Expect: Occurrences where it's constructed.
rg --type rust 'Context \{'

Length of output: 97



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify the exact location and context of the `Context` struct construction.

# Test: Search for the `Context` struct construction and display surrounding lines for context.
rg --type rust 'Context \{' -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 1001


30-33: The Repo struct is well-defined. However, please verify if this struct is constructed and used as intended in the codebase.

@Bullrich Bullrich merged commit 37c7065 into main May 24, 2024
4 checks passed
@Bullrich Bullrich deleted the context branch May 24, 2024 12:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant