Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create initial revision on contest/problem clone #1679

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2021

Conversation

Ninjaclasher
Copy link
Member

Done to match the initial revision created when a contest/problem is create on the admin site.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1679 (bc55a53) into master (27f475c) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 11.11%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1679      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   46.41%   46.39%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         216      216              
  Lines       12341    12351      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         5728     5730       +2     
- Misses       6613     6621       +8     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
judge/views/problem.py 25.10% <9.09%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
judge/views/contests.py 29.96% <12.50%> (-0.10%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 27f475c...bc55a53. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@kiritofeng kiritofeng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise LGTM

problem.contest = contest
problem.pk = None
ContestProblem.objects.bulk_create(contest_problems)
with transaction.atomic(), revisions.create_revision():
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does revisions.create_revision(atomic=True) work?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked the code and it does work, but I don't think it makes a difference which way you use.

@quantum5 quantum5 merged commit e24e2ea into DMOJ:master May 8, 2021
@Ninjaclasher Ninjaclasher deleted the clone-revision branch May 9, 2021 19:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants