Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2023-10-24] [$500] Workspace - Admin Checkbox in Members Section Ticked When Changing Contact Method #28539

Closed
6 tasks done
kbecciv opened this issue Sep 30, 2023 · 44 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Comments

@kbecciv
Copy link

kbecciv commented Sep 30, 2023

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. Go to Settings > Profile > Contact Method > Add New Contact Method
  2. Go to Settings > Create Workspace > Members > Invite Members
  3. Go to Settings > Profile > Contact Method > Change Contact Method
  4. Go to Settings > Workspace > Members > Tick on the Select All checkboxes and observe that the Admin checkbox is also selected

Expected Result:

Changing the contact method should not cause the Admin checkbox to be ticked in the Members section.

Actual Result:

Changing the contact method causes the Admin checkbox to be ticked in the Members section.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.73.0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Recorder_30092023_183937.mp4
Recorder_30092023_161410.mp4
Recorder_30092023_085849.mp4
Screen.Recording.2023-09-29.at.10.38.26.PM.mov
Recording.1631.mp4
screen-capture.-.2023-09-22T140546.004.webm
screen-capture.5.mp4

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @tewodrosGirmaA
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1695415622144909

View all open jobs on GitHub

@kbecciv kbecciv added External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Sep 30, 2023
@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor

esh-g commented Sep 30, 2023

Proposal

Please re-state the issue

Able to select the policy owner after changing the contact method.

What is the root cause of this issue?

While checking whether an option should be disabled, we are setting the isDisabled property to true here:

isDisabled: accountID === props.session.accountID || details.login === props.policy.owner || policyMember.pendingAction === CONST.RED_BRICK_ROAD_PENDING_ACTION.DELETE,

But the accountID from props.policyMembers is actually a string while the props.session.accountID is actually a Number.

What changes do you think should be made to fix this problem?

We should convert the accountID from props.policyMembers to Number before comparing like we do in many other places for accountID.

isDisabled: Number(accountID) === props.session.accountID || details.login === props.policy.owner || policyMember.pendingAction === CONST.RED_BRICK_ROAD_PENDING_ACTION.DELETE,

What other alternative options did you explore? (Optional)

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 30, 2023

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01ccfbef1a9c9e1edd

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Workspace - Admin Checkbox in Members Section Ticked When Changing Contact Method [$500] Workspace - Admin Checkbox in Members Section Ticked When Changing Contact Method Sep 30, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 30, 2023

Triggered auto assignment to @alexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Sep 30, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 30, 2023

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

  • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
  • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
    • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
  • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
    • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
    • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
  • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
    • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
  • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 30, 2023

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @parasharrajat (External)

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Workspace - Admin Checkbox in Members Section Ticked When Changing Contact Method

What is the root cause of that problem?

When we change the contact method, policy.onwer is not updated until the openApp API is called again so details.login === props.policy.owner is false. Additional, props.session.accountID is string and accountID is number that makes accountID === props.session.accountID is always false

isDisabled: accountID === props.session.accountID || details.login === props.policy.owner || policyMember.pendingAction === CONST.RED_BRICK_ROAD_PENDING_ACTION.DELETE,

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

Instead of compare accountID === props.session.accountID we can re-use isAdmin or use props.session.email === details.login

const isAdmin = props.session.email === details.login || policyMember.role === CONST.POLICY.ROLE.ADMIN;

isDisabled: accountID === props.session.accountID || details.login === props.policy.owner || policyMember.pendingAction === CONST.RED_BRICK_ROAD_PENDING_ACTION.DELETE,

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

In setContactMethodAsDefault function we can update policy.onwer of all policies of current user to new contact method in optimisticData and reset it in failureData

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Oct 3, 2023
@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat - when you get a chance can you review if one of these proposals will resolve this issue? Thanks!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Oct 3, 2023
@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat any update here?

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Started reviewing...

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Oct 8, 2023

Nice Catch. @esh-g proposal looks good to me. We migrated to accountId so that should be used. But this feels more like a backend change. We should use one type for account IDs everywhere.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 8, 2023

Triggered auto assignment to @marcaaron, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Oct 10, 2023
@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Marc is OOO but will review soon. If Marc is unable to help, I'll find help to keep it moving forward.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Oct 10, 2023
@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

the accountID from props.policyMembers is actually a string while the props.session.accountID is actually a Number.

Not sure why the accountID would ever be a string though. This sounds like more of a backend error to me.

cc @puneetlath I think this change was first introduced here in case you have some idea.

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

Rejected the proposal because:

We should convert the accountID from props.policyMembers to Number before comparing like we do in many other places for accountID.

It looks like we already do this here.

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

Passing the 🏀 back to you @parasharrajat 😄

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

Oh duh I see now that the isDisabled logic is set in the same object 🤦

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

marcaaron commented Oct 10, 2023

I think ideally we can fix this at a lower level instead of cast to a Number everywhere. Let's find out where we are setting the ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.POLICY_MEMBERS accountID to a string.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@esh-g can you analyze this #28539 (comment)?

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor

esh-g commented Oct 12, 2023

@parasharrajat PR is ready: #29422 💫

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

Yep exactly

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome, looks like the PR is moving forward!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Oct 17, 2023
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [$500] Workspace - Admin Checkbox in Members Section Ticked When Changing Contact Method [HOLD for payment 2023-10-24] [$500] Workspace - Admin Checkbox in Members Section Ticked When Changing Contact Method Oct 17, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2023

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Oct 17, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2023

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.85-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-24. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

  • External issue reporter
  • Contributor that fixed the issue
  • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

  • Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
  • Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2023

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@parasharrajat] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
  • [@parasharrajat] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
  • [@parasharrajat] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
  • [@parasharrajat] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
  • [@parasharrajat] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  • [@alexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat - to prepare for the payment date, can you please complete the checklist? Thanks!

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat - please complete the checklist. Thanks!

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

Regression Test Steps

  1. Create a new workspace.
  2. Go to workspace members page.
  3. Make sure we are not able to select the workspace admin (current user)
  4. Go to contact methods.
  5. Add a new contact method and set it as your default.
  6. Go to workspace members page.
  7. Make sure we are not able to select the workspace admin (current user)

Do you agree 👍 or 👎 ?

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Daily KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Oct 24, 2023
@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@marcaaron - can we confirm if you agree with the regression test above?

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Here is the payment summary:

Upwork Job: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01ccfbef1a9c9e1edd

*If applicable, the bonuses will be applied on the final payment

Extra Notes regarding payment: There is an urgency bonus and hit the 3-day business day mark.

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@tewodrosGirmaA and @esh-g - can you please apply to the link above and I can complete the next steps in Upwork. Not sure what happened but the automation didn't kick in here. Thanks!

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor

esh-g commented Oct 25, 2023

Applied @alexpensify 🚀

@tewodrosGirmaA
Copy link

tewodrosGirmaA commented Oct 25, 2023

Applied @alexpensify

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

alexpensify commented Oct 25, 2023

Thanks! I need your approval in Upwork, and then can complete the process.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor

esh-g commented Oct 25, 2023

Accepted the offer @alexpensify

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Everyone has been paid via Upwork.

@parasharrajat please submit your request too. Thanks!

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Alright, the regression test has been created so I'm going to close out the issue. Great work here!

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Payment requested as per #28539 (comment)

@JmillsExpensify
Copy link

$750 payment approved for @parasharrajat based on this comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants