Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display Route #25434

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Display Route #25434

merged 33 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023

Conversation

thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

@thienlnam thienlnam commented Aug 17, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #22708
PROPOSAL:

Tests

For engineers, if you're building and testing this PR in the development environment, you first need to run npm run configure-mapbox to setup the development environment.

  1. Go to 'Request Money', 'Distance'
  2. Add in a couple addresses
  3. Verify that you see the route
  4. Add stops
  5. Verify that new routes are generated correctly
  6. Remove one of the stops by editing the waypoint, and deleting all the text and pressing 'Enter'
  7. Verify the new route is generated successfully

Offline tests

Offline is known to not work at this time. You can save waypoints while offline but when coming online there will be an error. This is known at the time.

QA Steps

  1. Go to 'Request Money', 'Distance'
  2. Add in a couple addresses
  3. Verify that you see the route (You might have to scroll out to find the route unless you choose addresses in San Francisco. There is another PR that will handle the readjustment of the map)
  4. Add stops
  5. Verify that new routes are generated correctly

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-08-21.at.5.45.54.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-08-21.at.5.52.00.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Desktop
iOS
Android

@thienlnam thienlnam changed the base branch from main to hayata-add-map August 17, 2023 22:06
Base automatically changed from hayata-add-map to main August 18, 2023 03:36
@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

hey @thienlnam I sent you a message about this PR in slack

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

hayata-suenaga commented Aug 21, 2023

just heads up. I'm changing react-native-x-maps a little bit in this PR to fix some issues, but this doesn't change the interface/API of MapView. So you don't have to wait for it to finish to merge your PR 👍

UPDATE:
The PR was merged and the version of react-native-x-maps was bumped to 1.0.8. You can change the version specified in package.json to that version. As I wrote above, this won't change how MapView works

@thienlnam thienlnam marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2023 00:58
@thienlnam thienlnam requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2023 00:58
@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

Oops. Lint failure @thienlnam!

hayata-suenaga
hayata-suenaga previously approved these changes Aug 22, 2023
const hasRouteError = Boolean(lodashGet(transaction, 'errorFields.route'));
const previousWaypoints = usePrevious(waypoints);
const haveWaypointsChanged = !_.isEqual(previousWaypoints, waypoints);
const shouldFetchRoute = haveWaypointsChanged || !isOffline || !isLoadingRoute || TransactionUtils.validateWaypoints(waypoints);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is wrong again @thienlnam. Lets keep this as it was and just change the variable name to shouldIgnoreFetching

Copy link
Contributor Author

@thienlnam thienlnam Aug 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I fixed it - we don't use the inverse as much so I just adjusted the check (more of a preference thing though)

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from arosiclair August 22, 2023 22:28
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 22, 2023

@arosiclair Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor Author

Removing additional auto-assigned reviewers since @hayata-suenaga is already on this

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga merged commit a6e6b31 into main Aug 22, 2023
14 checks passed
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga deleted the jack-add-map-display-route branch August 22, 2023 23:09
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/hayata-suenaga in version: 1.3.57-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/hayata-suenaga in version: 1.3.58-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.57-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.58-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

useEffect(updateGradientVisibility, [scrollContainerHeight, scrollContentHeight]);

return (
<>
<ScreenWrapper shouldEnableMaxHeight>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nested ScreenWrapper can cause extra padding. There should only be one ScreenWrapper component per page. This caused #26008.

@@ -96,8 +119,72 @@ function removeWaypoint(transactionID, currentIndex) {
...transaction.comment,
waypoints: reIndexedWaypoints,
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should also clear the error when we are removing the waypoint as we do in saveWaypoint action . This caused #27538

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants