Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Insights Help page #25954

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

Create Insights Help page #25954

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

laurenreidexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@laurenreidexpensify laurenreidexpensify commented Aug 25, 2023

https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/311034

Details

See screenshot here (with the note that I removed the colons from the nav titles after that was taken).

If you want to test this locally, you'll need to:

  • Follow these steps
  • Change the image URL here to be http://127.0.0.1:4000/assets... instead of https://help.expensify.com/assets...

Fixed Issues

$
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Reviewed locally

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

NA

QA Steps

  • Make sure the page appears in the nav under "Other" in help.expensify.com
  • Make sure the page matches the screenshot here
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile Web - Safari
Desktop
iOS
Android

@laurenreidexpensify laurenreidexpensify requested a review from a team as a code owner August 25, 2023 15:44
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team August 25, 2023 15:44
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 25, 2023

@sobitneupane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from sobitneupane August 25, 2023 15:44
@laurenreidexpensify laurenreidexpensify removed the request for review from sobitneupane August 25, 2023 15:44
@laurenreidexpensify laurenreidexpensify self-assigned this Aug 25, 2023
@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor

Here's the latest screenshot.
Screenshot 2023-08-28 at 14-25-08 Custom Reporting and Insights

@dangrous dangrous self-assigned this Aug 28, 2023
@dangrous dangrous requested review from a team and removed request for dangrous August 28, 2023 18:46
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ArekChr and removed request for a team August 28, 2023 18:47
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 28, 2023

@ArekChr Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@laurenreidexpensify laurenreidexpensify changed the title Create Insights Create Insights Help page Aug 29, 2023
@MariaHCD
Copy link
Contributor

MariaHCD commented Aug 29, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web ![screencapture-127-0-0-1-4000-articles-other-Insights-2023-08-29-15_32_34](https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/12268372/7b20aa6e-dd04-4add-b977-72cf5c1e906f)
Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile Web - Safari
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.SE.3rd.generation.-.2023-08-29.at.15.30.28.mp4
Desktop
iOS
Android

@laurenreidexpensify laurenreidexpensify removed the request for review from ArekChr August 29, 2023 11:30
@MariaHCD MariaHCD merged commit 3f9f1e6 into main Aug 29, 2023
16 checks passed
@MariaHCD MariaHCD deleted the laurenreidexpensify-patch-2 branch August 29, 2023 11:34
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

@ArekChr ArekChr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added some minor suggestions 🙌


#### What other kinds of export reports can my Account Manager help me create?

We’ve built a huge variety of custom reports for customers, so make sure to reach out to your Account Manager for more details. Some examples of custom reports we’ve build for customers before are:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
We’ve built a huge variety of custom reports for customers, so make sure to reach out to your Account Manager for more details. Some examples of custom reports we’ve build for customers before are:
We’ve built a huge variety of custom reports for customers, so make sure to reach out to your Account Manager for more details. Some examples of custom reports we’ve built for customers before are:

Yes! We have [seven default reports](https://community.expensify.com/discussion/5602/deep-dive-default-export-templates) available to export directly from the Reports page:

- **All Data** - Expense Level Export** - the name says it all! This is for the people who want ALL the details from their expense reports. We're talking Tax, Merchant Category Codes, Approvers - you name it, this report's got it!
- **All Data** - Report Level Export - this is the report for those who don't need to see each individual expense but want to see a line by line breakdown at a report level - submitter, total amount, report ID - that kind of stuff
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- **All Data** - Report Level Export - this is the report for those who don't need to see each individual expense but want to see a line by line breakdown at a report level - submitter, total amount, report ID - that kind of stuff
- **All Data** - Report Level Export - this is the report for those who don't need to see each individual expense but want to see a line-by-line breakdown at a report level - submitter, total amount, report ID - that kind of stuff


1. Switch the View in the top right corner of the [Insights page](https://www.expensify.com/expenses?param={"fromInsightsTab":true,"viewMode":"charts"}) to the lists icon
2. Select the expenses you want to export, either by selecting individual expenses, or checking the select all box (next to Date at the top)
3. Select **Export To** in the top right hand corner to download the report as a .csv file
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
3. Select **Export To** in the top right hand corner to download the report as a .csv file
3. Select **Export To** in the top right-hand corner to download the report as a .csv file

![Insights Pie Chart](https://help.expensify.com/assets/images/insights-chart.png){:width="100%"}
## Review your Insights data

1. Navigate to your [Insights page](https://www.expensify.com/expenses?param={"fromInsightsTab":true,"viewMode":"charts"}), located in the left hand menu
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
1. Navigate to your [Insights page](https://www.expensify.com/expenses?param={"fromInsightsTab":true,"viewMode":"charts"}), located in the left hand menu
1. Navigate to your [Insights page](https://www.expensify.com/expenses?param={"fromInsightsTab":true,"viewMode":"charts"}), located in the left-hand menu


1. Navigate to your [Insights page](https://www.expensify.com/expenses?param={"fromInsightsTab":true,"viewMode":"charts"}), located in the left hand menu
2. Select a specific date range (the default view has the current month pre-selected)
3. Use the filter options to select the categories, tags, employees etc that you want insights on
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
3. Use the filter options to select the categories, tags, employees etc that you want insights on
3. Use the filter options to select the categories, tags, employees etc. that you want insights on

<!-- The lines above are required by Jekyll to process the .md file -->
{% raw %}
# What is Custom Reporting and Insights?
The Insights dashboard allows you to monitor all aspects of company spend across categories, employees, projects, departments, and more. You can see trends in real time, forecast company budgets, and build unlimited custom reports with help from our trained specialist team.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The Insights dashboard allows you to monitor all aspects of company spend across categories, employees, projects, departments, and more. You can see trends in real time, forecast company budgets, and build unlimited custom reports with help from our trained specialist team.
The Insights dashboard allows you to monitor all aspects of company spending across categories, employees, projects, departments, and more. You can see trends in real-time, forecast company budgets, and build unlimited custom reports with help from our trained specialist team.


1. Navigate to **Settings > Account > Preferences > scroll down to CSV Export Formats**
2. Build up a report using these [formulas](https://community.expensify.com/discussion/5795/deep-dive-expense-level-formula/p1?new=1)
3. Click the **Custom Export** button on the Insights page and your Account Manager will help get you started on building up your report
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
3. Click the **Custom Export** button on the Insights page and your Account Manager will help get you started on building up your report
3. Click the **Custom Export** button on the Insights page, and your Account Manager will help get you started on building up your report

- **All Data** - Expense Level Export** - the name says it all! This is for the people who want ALL the details from their expense reports. We're talking Tax, Merchant Category Codes, Approvers - you name it, this report's got it!
- **All Data** - Report Level Export - this is the report for those who don't need to see each individual expense but want to see a line by line breakdown at a report level - submitter, total amount, report ID - that kind of stuff
- **Basic Export** - this is the best way to get a simple breakdown of all your expenses - just the basics
- **Canadian Multiple Tax Export** - tax, GST, PST...if you need to know tax then this is the export you want!
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- **Canadian Multiple Tax Export** - tax, GST, PST...if you need to know tax then this is the export you want!
- **Canadian Multiple Tax Export** - tax, GST, PST...if you need to know tax, this is the export you want!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from francoisl August 29, 2023 11:41
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2023

@francoisl Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2023

🎯 @ArekChr, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #26183.

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor

@laurenreidexpensify let me know if you want to make those changes @ArekChr suggested! I think most of them are good ideas (adding the hyphens, updating that build typo)

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MariaHCD in version: 1.3.59-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MariaHCD in version: 1.3.60-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MariaHCD in version: 1.3.60-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.59-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.60-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants