Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CP Staging] Fix crash upon Request Preview open #26611

Merged

Conversation

pradeepmdk
Copy link
Contributor

@pradeepmdk pradeepmdk commented Sep 3, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #26585
PROPOSAL: #26585 (comment)

Tests

  1. Launch New Expensify app
  2. Go to workspace chat
  3. Go to + > Request money > Distance
  4. Create a distance request
  5. Right after the request is created (when it shows $0.00), click on the IOU to open IOU thread and wait for a while
  6. Relaunch New Expensify app
  7. Go to the created distance IOU
  8. Verify there is no crash
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Untitled.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
WhatsApp.Video.2023-09-03.at.11.32.44.PM.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
WhatsApp.Video.2023-09-03.at.11.29.56.PM.mp4
Desktop
Untitled.mp4
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-09-03.at.11.23.28.PM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-09-03.at.11.19.32.PM.mov

@pradeepmdk pradeepmdk requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2023 18:10
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from parasharrajat and removed request for a team September 3, 2023 18:10
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 3, 2023

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@mountiny mountiny changed the title 26585-app-crash-when-opening-iou-thread [CP Staging] 26585-app-crash-when-opening-iou-thread Sep 3, 2023
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the title [CP Staging] 26585-app-crash-when-opening-iou-thread [CP Staging] Fix crash upon Request Preview open Sep 3, 2023
@@ -18,7 +18,10 @@ function Image(props) {
const {source, isAuthTokenRequired, session, ...rest} = props;

let imageSource = source;
if (typeof source !== 'number' && isAuthTokenRequired) {
if (source && source.uri && typeof source.uri === 'number') {
imageSource = source.uri;
Copy link
Contributor

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga Sep 3, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@parasharrajat

could you test other Image components used in App to make sure this doesn't break other parts of App? 🙇 🙇 🙇

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, for sure.

Co-authored-by: Rajat Parashar <parasharrajat@users.noreply.github.com>
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ const imagePropTypes = {
source: PropTypes.oneOfType([
PropTypes.number,
PropTypes.shape({
uri: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
uri: PropTypes.oneOfType([PropTypes.string, PropTypes.number]).isRequired,
Copy link
Contributor

@Pujan92 Pujan92 Sep 3, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

isn't the uri should be always string https://reactnative.dev/docs/image#imagesource(I mean aren't we pass a direct number if required instead of wrapping in a object and assigning it to the uri)?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was done initially but that would have required us managing the different value everywhere Image is used so I thought why don't we handle this inside Image.

Now you don't have to handle differences between platfroms for local resources. Just use {uri: localpath /resoource ID} .

Do you have any suggestions?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TBH I don't have any suggestions yet, I just found URI is a string in all places for React doc. Also strange that we are using the same pattern earlier and didn't face this issue for android. I will update in case I find something.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will break source prop in other places also.
Please look into this urgently.
cc @parasharrajat

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should rather modify the ReceiptUtils.getThumbnailAndImageURIs function ig.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this image passes to ReportActionItemImage

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I see. The resolution of this problem is more straightforward than anticipated.
@pradeepmdk @parasharrajat Allow me to fix this in #26452

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ya because #26452 you are splitting the sourcePropTypes here. so we need to update to allow numbers on native.js.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, it is not a bug deal. Image is a custom component and it is always better to keep the same prop format. I would prefer if we were just able to use {uri: anything} on all platforms. Less confusing.

I was going to suggest limiting the prop format to this only but that requires a bigger refactor which is unrelated to both problems we are solving(this & #26452). In short, no passing of direct require reference.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@parasharrajat I also prefer this.

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat @ZhenjaHorbach can either of you complete the checklist please?

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Sep 4, 2023

While testing, I found the case where string value is passed to Image source
i.e. /095ec87d162ff529c4f1.png

And this causes propType error as source is expected to be one of number or object ({uri: ''})

Screenshot 2023-09-04 at 10 05 33 AM

Anyway, not blocker for this PR as it doesn't actually crash

@situchan
Copy link
Contributor

situchan commented Sep 4, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mchrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
msafari.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@situchan situchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

source.uri : number
filename: undefined

Reproduced these on all platforms and confirmed no crash

:shipit:

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga merged commit a7dfd6f into Expensify:main Sep 4, 2023
14 of 15 checks passed
@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

hayata-suenaga commented Sep 4, 2023

Requesting CP now... requested

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 4, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
[CP Staging] Fix crash upon Request Preview open

(cherry picked from commit a7dfd6f)
@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

While testing, I found the case where string value is passed to Image source i.e. /095ec87d162ff529c4f1.png

And this causes propType error as source is expected to be one of number or object ({uri: ''})
Screenshot 2023-09-04 at 10 05 33 AM

Anyway, not blocker for this PR as it doesn't actually crash

@situchan Another PR for this #26452

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 4, 2023

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.62-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 4, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.62-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 5, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/hayata-suenaga in version: 1.3.64-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.64-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants