Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CP Stg] Don't skip successData or failureData even if OnyxData from server is up-to-date #34006

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham commented Jan 5, 2024

Details

#33666 appears to have caused a regression where successData and failureData are not always correctly applied. For me it was very easy to reproduce this problem by just refreshing the page, looking at isLoadingReportData in Onyx, and seeing that it was stuck as true, and not set to false as you would expect from the successData and failureData for ReconnectApp.

Fixed Issues

$ n/a – fresh issue I ran into on main during local development. It causes some bugs, such as the LHN not reordering when it should (I guess because there's some performance optimization logic to pause reordering when we're fetching new data)

Tests

  1. Refresh the page
  2. Verify via logs and the Application tab of the chrome dev console that isLoadingReportData is set to true when ReconnectApp first processes, then is set back to false after the command completes.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

n/a

QA Steps

Same as test steps. Basically just:

  1. refresh the page
  2. Wait a few seconds
  3. Open the dev console, then go to Application -> IndexedDB -> OnyxDB -> keyvaluepairs, search for isLoadingReportData, and verify that it's false. Hit the refresh button in the dev console if needed.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

image
image

MacOS: Desktop

@roryabraham roryabraham self-assigned this Jan 5, 2024
@roryabraham roryabraham requested a review from a team as a code owner January 5, 2024 06:45
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team January 5, 2024 06:45
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 5, 2024

@stitesExpensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title Don't skip successData or failureData Don't skip successData or failureData even if OnyxData from server is up-to-date Jan 5, 2024
@roryabraham roryabraham mentioned this pull request Jan 5, 2024
48 tasks
@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title Don't skip successData or failureData even if OnyxData from server is up-to-date [CP Stg] Don't skip successData or failureData even if OnyxData from server is up-to-date Jan 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code makes sense to me, looks like Reassure Performance Tests / perf-tests (pull_request) is failing though

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

roryabraham commented Jan 5, 2024

Reassure has been super slow and flaky recently, going to just retry and see if it works

Edit: We disabled some tests on main, so I merged main and am retrying without the disabled tests.

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify merged commit 1752b97 into main Jan 5, 2024
14 checks passed
@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify deleted the Rory-FixSuccessAndFailureData branch January 5, 2024 21:10
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 5, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
[CP Stg] Don't skip successData or failureData even if OnyxData from server is up-to-date

(cherry picked from commit 1752b97)
@OSBotify

This comment was marked as outdated.

@OSBotify

This comment was marked as outdated.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 5, 2024

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.4.22-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 9, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.4.22-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants