Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor/36648 wallet enablement flow connect steps #42589

Conversation

koko57
Copy link
Contributor

@koko57 koko57 commented May 24, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #36648
PROPOSAL: -

Tests

  1. Go to Settings/Wallet
  2. Click on Enable Wallet button
  3. Verify that you're redirected to /settings/wallet/enable-payments page.
  4. Go through the flow, verify that you can pass the flow successfully and the fields are validated properly.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

n/a

QA Steps

  1. Go to Settings/Wallet
  2. Click on Enable Wallet button
  3. Verify that you're redirected to /settings/wallet/enable-payments page.
  4. Go through the flow, verify that you can pass the flow successfully and the fields are validated properly.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screenshot_1716560222

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screenshot_1716559617
Screenshot_1716561395

iOS: Native

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro - 2024-05-24 at 15 59 48
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro - 2024-05-24 at 16 00 53

iOS: mWeb Safari

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro - 2024-05-24 at 16 39 44
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro - 2024-05-24 at 16 38 51

MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2024-05-24 at 15 59 11
MacOS: Desktop Screenshot 2024-05-24 at 16 06 14

…tor/36648-wallet-enablement-flow-verify-identity-draft
@koko57 koko57 marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2024 13:48
@koko57 koko57 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2024 13:48
@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

@koko57 Please address the lint error

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jun 10, 2024

@DylanDylann lint error fixed

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jun 10, 2024

@Pujan92 fixed

mountiny
mountiny previously approved these changes Jun 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Pujan92 @DylanDylann are you happy with the changes?

Copy link
Contributor

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

Please give me an hour to review the change

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Jun 10, 2024

@Pujan92 @DylanDylann are you happy with the changes?

Yes @mountiny, changes look good to me.

@jamesdeanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Hi all - apologies for the late copy suggestions, but I have a few. Let me know if this isn't the right place or time:

  • Under "What's your address?" could we do "No PO boxes or mail-drop addresses, please."
  • The first "Fees and terms" screen, maybe the header could just be "Please review the fees below"
  • The second "Fees and terms" screen, maybe the header could just be "Please check the boxes below"

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny June 10, 2024 16:44
@jamesdeanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Getting Spanish translations for the suggestions above, hold tight!

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jun 11, 2024

@jamesdeanexpensify ping me when you will have the translations ready, I will add them to this PR, thanks!

@jamesdeanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

  • No PO boxes or mail-drop addresses, please. > Nada de apartados de correos ni direcciones de envío, por favor.
  • Please review the fees below > Por favor, revisa las siguientes tarifas
  • Please check the boxes below > Por favor, marca las siguientes casillas

@jamesdeanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

ready for you @koko57 !

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jun 11, 2024

@jamesdeanexpensify thanks! applying them to this PR!

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor Author

koko57 commented Jun 11, 2024

@jamesdeanexpensify changes applied - the first pair of translations (No PO boxes...) was already in the app, but I needed to swap the translation key. The other translations were added.

@jamesdeanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @koko57 @DylanDylann @Pujan92 for getting this across the finish line 🙇

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 69dfe2a into Expensify:main Jun 12, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.83-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Comment on lines +41 to +47
<>
<HeaderWithBackButton
title={translate('additionalDetailsStep.headerTitle')}
onBackButtonPress={() => Navigation.goBack(ROUTES.SETTINGS_WALLET)}
/>
<FailedKYC />
</>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We missed wrapping those into ScreenWrapper, therefore it caused a UI bug here #44805

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants