Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Payment history] add "Request refund" menu item #44138

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

kubabutkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

@kubabutkiewicz kubabutkiewicz commented Jun 21, 2024

Details

Pre-requisite for the Payment/Subscription testing:

Have a create collect policy.
To access the subscription page, paste the following link into the browser
https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082/settings/subscription

or add this effect to InitialSettingsPage.tsx

useEffect(() => {
    Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SETTINGS_SUBSCRIPTION)
}, []);

Have an Account with isEligibleForRefund: true. If you don't have the account then use the following command to populate the Onxy keys

import Onyx from 'react-native-onyx';

useEffect(() => {
       Onyx.merge(ONYXKEYS.ACCOUNT, { isEligibleForRefund: true}); 
   }, []);

Fixed Issues

$ #43283

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Go to Subscription page
  2. Click on Request refund button
  3. Verify that modal shown
  4. Next click Downgrade...
  5. Verify that modal got closed and your account is downgraded

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Go to Subscription page
  2. Click on Request refund button
  3. Verify that modal shown
  4. Next click Downgrade...
  5. Verify that modal got closed and your account is downgraded

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native ios ios1
iOS: mWeb Safari msafari msafari1
MacOS: Chrome / Safari web1 web2
MacOS: Desktop desktop desktop1

@kubabutkiewicz kubabutkiewicz marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2024 07:11
@kubabutkiewicz kubabutkiewicz requested a review from a team as a code owner June 25, 2024 07:11
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from rushatgabhane and removed request for a team June 25, 2024 07:11
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 25, 2024

@rushatgabhane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

src/hooks/useIsEligibleForRefund.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/hooks/useIsEligibleForRefund.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/API/parameters/RequestRefundParams.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/API/types.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/actions/User.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@trjExpensify trjExpensify requested review from mananjadhav and removed request for rushatgabhane June 25, 2024 11:32
@kubabutkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav comments resolved

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Jun 27, 2024

@Expensify/design @blimpich @kubabutkiewicz The button text is getting cut off in the modal with Spanish translation.

Screenshot 2024-06-27 at 10 15 39 PM

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Jun 27, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-request-refund-modal.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome mweb-chrome-request-refund-modal
iOS: Native
ios-request-refund-modal.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
mweb-safari-request-refund-modal.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web-request-refund-modal.mov
MacOS: Desktop desktop-request-refund-modal

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@Expensify/design @blimpich Could we have Request refund, without having View payment history. When I play around with dummy data and this is true, the spacing is an issue. If this case can't exist then nothing needs to be fixed here. But if this is true, @kubabutkiewicz we'll have to fix the padding.

Screenshot 2024-06-27 at 10 23 31 PM

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm I'm not sure if you can have "Request refund" yet not have a payment card.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Can you show me what the :hover style looks like for that row? Thanks!

@blimpich
Copy link
Contributor

Could we have Request refund, without having View payment history?

No, not possible. In order to request a refund you must have a purchase, and if you have a purchase then that means "view payment history" should be visible.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you show me what the :hover style looks like for that row? Thanks!

@shawnborton Can you check the Mac Chrome/Safari video added ?

Could we have Request refund, without having View payment history?

No, not possible. In order to request a refund you must have a purchase, and if you have a purchase then that means "view payment history" should be visible.

Thanks for confirming.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome, just checked and the styles look correct to me. Thanks!

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Jun 28, 2024

@Expensify/design @blimpich @kubabutkiewicz The button text is getting cut off in the modal with Spanish translation.

@Expensify/design @blimpich @kubabutkiewicz Any thoughts on this Discussion here

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from blimpich July 1, 2024 08:32
@kubabutkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Posting screenshots with new Spanish translations

image image

Copy link
Contributor

@blimpich blimpich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right now when I click on the downgrade button we stay on the subscription page, but what we want is for the user to be redirected to the chats page. See this section of the design doc

Clicking “Delete workspace(s) and downgrade” should also drop the user into their chats.

If we don't do this the user will just see a "not found" page once they downgrade.

@kubabutkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blimpich done!

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

The redirect is working fine. @blimpich Is this the expected behavior?

web-redirect-to-chat-downgrade.mov

@blimpich blimpich merged commit 519d096 into Expensify:main Jul 2, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 2, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 3, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.0.4-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 4, 2024

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 9.0.4-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.0.5-13 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.6-8 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants