Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct reference value size #3373

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Correct reference value size #3373

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

jorgensd
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Use element value size to create reference buffer.
At least partially resolves #3372

@jorgensd jorgensd added this to the 0.9.0 milestone Sep 3, 2024
@jorgensd jorgensd added the backport? Suggest PR for backporting label Sep 3, 2024
@garth-wells
Copy link
Member

@mscroggs is part of the confusion here the we still have 'blocked' finite elements?

@jorgensd
Copy link
Sponsor Member Author

Ping @mscroggs :)

@mscroggs
Copy link
Member

mscroggs commented Sep 12, 2024

We should add some more thorough testing of interpolation into blocked elements (but not necessarily in this same PR)

@jorgensd jorgensd added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 12, 2024
@jorgensd
Copy link
Sponsor Member Author

We should add some more thorough testing of interpolation into blocked elements (but not necessarily in this same PR)

I guess we want more tests on manifolds (as I think we test blocked interpolation on non-manifold geometries thoroughly)

Merged via the queue into main with commit f6a4a5a Sep 12, 2024
27 checks passed
@jorgensd jorgensd deleted the dokken/manifold_interpolation branch September 12, 2024 06:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport? Suggest PR for backporting
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG]: Interpolation on manifold broken
3 participants