Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix!: replace random_id with random_string to increase number of possible access levels #191

Conversation

daniel-cit
Copy link
Contributor

@daniel-cit daniel-cit commented Apr 5, 2024

This PR replaces the random_id used in the composition of the names of the Access Level and Perimeter created in the secure-serverless-harness so that instead of a space with [0-9a-f](4) we will have [0-9a-z](4) which will decrease the chance of a collision of names when running tests

Error: Error creating AccessPolicy: googleapi: Error 409: Policy already exists with parent organizations/00000000000000

@daniel-cit daniel-cit requested review from prabhu34, anamer, gtsorbo and a team as code owners April 5, 2024 18:29
@apeabody
Copy link
Contributor

apeabody commented Apr 5, 2024

/gcbrun

@apeabody apeabody changed the title fix: replace random_id with random_string to increase number of possible acceess levels fix: replace random_id with random_string to increase number of possible access levels Apr 5, 2024
@daniel-cit daniel-cit changed the title fix: replace random_id with random_string to increase number of possible access levels fix!: replace random_id with random_string to increase number of possible access levels Apr 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@apeabody apeabody left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution @daniel-cit!

@apeabody apeabody enabled auto-merge (squash) April 8, 2024 15:31
@apeabody
Copy link
Contributor

apeabody commented Apr 8, 2024

/gcbrun

@apeabody apeabody merged commit f6cd4b2 into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Apr 8, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants