Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redesign the model for asynchronous ingest of tabular files in 4.0 #118

Closed
eaquigley opened this issue Jul 9, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@eaquigley
Copy link
Contributor


Author Name: Leonid Andreev (@landreev)
Original Redmine Issue: 3527, https://redmine.hmdc.harvard.edu/issues/3527
Original Date: 2014-02-03
Original Assignee: Elda Sotiri


This is NOT for 4.0alpha1;
Design a new model for async ingest framework.
Specifically, review alternatives for the message-based model currently in use in 3.*.

Gustavo and I will meet to discuss this.


Related issue(s): #28
Redmine related issue(s): 3435


@eaquigley
Copy link
Contributor Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Leonid Andreev (@landreev)
Original Date: 2014-04-11T02:57:54Z


This functionality was not working properly for the last couple (?) of days, after the dataset page was modified to go through file metadatas to list the files - instead of going from dataset to datafiles directly.
I've committed some code earlier today that fixed it, so this should be ready for QA.

@eaquigley eaquigley added this to the Dataverse 4.0: Beta 1 milestone Jul 9, 2014
@eaquigley
Copy link
Contributor Author


Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Elda Sotiri (@esotiri)
Original Date: 2014-04-16T21:02:56Z


seem to work ok now.

sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 26, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 26, 2021
janvanmansum pushed a commit to janvanmansum/dataverse that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2021
* Updated SwordServiceBean to support multi-license
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants