-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 488
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UNF Fixes #3629
Comments
Status updates:
|
Another case: Please note, that just like with the case 1) above the integrity of the UNF signatures was not compromised. They were not showing in the citations of some dataset versions, but the important file level UNFs were still in place. |
|
More TODO:s left:
|
- fixes the version UNF in JSON import; - changes the logic in the fixMissingUnf call, to reuse the UNF of an earlier version, if available, and if the tabular file UNFs are identical; unless a recalculation is specifically requested, with a "force" option.
Created a pull request: #3656 There are 2 Application code changes:
|
@scolapasta - I checked in the 2 minor fixes you suggested per code review. |
For the migration/import test, here's a sample DDI:
To test the migration import: Assuming you have a dataverse with the alias "king": Copy the DDI file into a directory with the same name somewhere, for example And call the migration API, for example: curl 'http://localhost:8080/api/batch/migrate?path=/tmp&key=YOURKEY' (i.e., the "path" parameter is the directory above the directory where the DDI file is located; the name of the subdirectory is used to determine which dataverse the dataset will be imported into) |
(and, if successful, the imported dataset should have the UNF...) |
More unf improvements, from the todo list in #3629:
This issue is for fixing UNFs that were dropped from some of the dataset citations in production.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: