Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

d435i / d430i HID device required to connect camera #3803

Closed
state-of-the-art opened this issue Apr 20, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

d435i / d430i HID device required to connect camera #3803

state-of-the-art opened this issue Apr 20, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@state-of-the-art
Copy link


Required Info
Camera Model D435i
Firmware Version 5.11.1.100
Operating System & Version Android 7.0 Nougat SM-G950U1
Kernel Version (Linux Only) 4.4.16-12116658
Platform ARM64
SDK Version 2.19.2 / 2.20.0
Language C++
Segment Smartphone

Issue Description

Hello guys,

During debug of D435i connection issues was found that the camera can't be connected on the android phone just because of the hid devices are not available state-of-the-art/Handy3DScanner#26 (please see the logs in the ticket).

It's not a good idea to not connect device just because some of the functionality (IMU sensor in this case) is not available. Basically the device is working without this sensor and could stream the depth data (main device purpose).

Additional features should be optional and not mandatory - we can see that when device is connected there is additional warning from librs:

W librs   : HID device is missing!

So it's just enough (with message adjusting) to see that the IMU will not work properly.

@dorodnic
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @state-of-the-art
Sorry for long response time. Yes, this is an option. I'm also waiting on proper HID via USB support, that is being delayed, but is coming. We will try to add something like this in the meantime.

@MartyG-RealSense
Copy link
Collaborator

@state-of-the-art I just wanted to update your case to let you know that D435i support for Android has apparently been added in the new SDK version 2.26.0, according to the Releases web-page.

@state-of-the-art
Copy link
Author

Thank you @MartyG-RealSense , I will check the new release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants