Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved CodeSpec imports #760

Merged
merged 152 commits into from
Jul 6, 2018
Merged

Improved CodeSpec imports #760

merged 152 commits into from
Jul 6, 2018

Conversation

elwazana
Copy link
Collaborator

@elwazana elwazana commented Jul 5, 2018

As per issue #569

samm82 and others added 30 commits May 25, 2018 09:46
* started update of RefName type; stuck on Title as a Sentence mismatch

* Added noSpaces as requested in 73d16d3 comments

* added another field specifically for shortname for the section datatype (as discussed in issue #551); Example files broken

* Re-added ShortName.hs (oops)

* make runs fine; removed some warnings wrt redundant imports; logs no longer empty

* hack closes #551

* Added RefAff to Language.Drasil to specify type signature of section'

* Formatting and removing Rationale in this branch
* Removed redundancies and unused variables

* Removed unused code and renamed shadowed bindings

* Reverted changes on ufixme1 and ufixme2
* Started to remove and replace acroDD in SSP

* Reverted back to detailed import lists

* Moved re-usable Expr functions into BasicExprs.hs

* transferred re-usaeable Expr functions into BasicExprs.hs

* Moved re-useable Expr functions into BasicExprs.hs

* Added BasicExprs.hs to drasil.cabal

* Re-did replacement of acroDD with less redundancy

* Removed the defintion of acroDD from Data/Drasil/SentenceStructure

* Updated stable to matches changes brought about the replacement of acroDD
…the implementation of UID. (Comment 6, Bullet 1, Issue #562)
@JacquesCarette JacquesCarette merged commit 03f9afc into master Jul 6, 2018
@JacquesCarette JacquesCarette deleted the importCodeSpec branch July 6, 2018 02:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants