Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove CachedMethodTable #296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2022
Merged

remove CachedMethodTable #296

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2022

Conversation

aviatesk
Copy link
Contributor

Apologize for the confusion!
In JuliaLang/julia#44240, we figured out that
CachedMethodTable doesn't give us any performance benefit (both in
time and space), and so we removed that from Julia Base.
This commit updates the (newly updated) GPUCompiler's overloads accordingly.

Apologize for the confusion!
In <JuliaLang/julia#44240>, we figured out that
`CachedMethodTable` doesn't give us any performance benefit (both in
time and space), and so we removed that from Julia Base.
This commit updates the (newly updated) GPUCompiler's overloads accordingly.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #296 (e145095) into master (dc7685e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #296   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.67%   85.67%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines        2073     2073           
=======================================
  Hits         1776     1776           
  Misses        297      297           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/jlgen.jl 81.81% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dc7685e...e145095. Read the comment docs.

@maleadt
Copy link
Member

maleadt commented Feb 23, 2022

No problem, thanks for the PR!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants